Rhys Tuck: A Man Alive With Two Legs

Dedicated to the ill-fated visionary biped.

Stats
Theology: Christian Theist
Philosophy: Thomist
Epistemology and Axiology: Objectivist, Limited Absolutism
Predestination: Molinist
Soteriology: Inclusivist
Eschatology: Amillennial Preterist
Political Stance: Pantisocratist
Economic Stance: Distributist
Myers-Briggs/Keirsey Type: INTP

Non-enemies
Patrick gets jiggy wit' it
Boo-tay-licious Bill
Shawni 100%!
Candy boys
X-treme

Tibby the Tyborg
J-Law: She's still Jenny from the block
Jonathan Logan Live!
Stan goes wild!
Kinoko something something
GK Chesterton's Blog

Favourite Christian Writers
CS Lewis
JRR Tolkien
GK Chesterton
Dorothy L Sayers
George Macdonald
Fyodor Dostoevsky
John Milton
Coleridge
Oscar Wilde

Apologists, Theologians and Philosophers
Thomas Aquinas
Glenn Miller
JP Holding
Dave Armstrong
James W Sire
Francis A Schaeffer
Phillip E Johnson
FC Copleston

Etc
Tweb
Project Gutenburg
AiG

Fruitcakes with Nuts
Gene Ray
Alex Chiu
Emotion Eric

Please click here for extreme pain


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Sunday, October 24, 2004
 
An ironic case of unintended consequences

Heh heh, for years, paranoid fundamentalist Christians have droned on
about the horrors of halloween, how it turns young children into
sex-orgy-animal-sacrificing-satan-worshippers, etc (Strange how
much they go on about it over here when I don't usually see it
happen here in Australia, it's such an American thing). Now
this school has decided to cancel it's halloween celebrations,
not because of pissing off the Harry-Potter-bookburning crowd,
no, instead because they're afraid they might offend actual witches!

Monday, October 11, 2004
 
Here I wrote:

Becoming unemployed sure is a full time job.
I need a holiday from being unemployed. If only
I could find someone to lend me their job for a
couple of weeks, then I could go back to being
unemployed refreshed and rejuvenated.


It looks like my prayers have been answered,
in a way. Today I got a letter for...Jury duty!
That's something interesting to look forward to.
Plus, I don't have any valid excuses for getting
out of it.

Wednesday, September 29, 2004
 
Anyone else remember this? Posted by Hello


 
Aww! Look at this cute kid! Posted by Hello


Saturday, September 25, 2004


 
The other candidates

Let's have a look at some of our senate candidates for
queesland.

Socialist Alliance
I guess you'd vote for these guys if you'd feel more safe
with secret police everywhere and the security of the gulag.
Or maybe for the shutdown of oppressive religious
institutions like the Salvation Army and St Vincent De Paul's,
or starting a weapons pileup for a new cold war
are selling points. On the plus side, you'd get to have
some fun slaugtering them nasty capitalist pigdogs.
What's interesting is that according to this page,
one of them is a lecturer, and the other is a student.

Liberals for Forests

This is an intersting one. It's not the
'anti-deforestation party' or something else, but people who
have gone, well, I like being a liberal, but on the other hand,
I do like having trees around. I know! I'll be a Liberal for
forests!' Maybe these guys thought that the
greens were getting all the environmental
issue votes, but were too far on the left on other
issues, so decided to make a more conservative
alternative. That's my guess, anyway, and I
can't be bothered actually looking them up. One
is an economist, the other an econometrician.
I've never heard of an econometrician, and I'm
not sure what the difference is to being an
economist.

Hemp
Like pot? Wish it was legal? In that case, you know
where your vote is going. One is an Artist/poet,
the other is unemployed. One of them is the guy
that changed his name to Guy Freemarijuana.

Citizens Electoral Coucil

I wonder what these guys stand for. Vote
for us and we'll have more elections? Less
elections? More well regulated elections?
Maybe replace traditional ballot voting with
a boxing match between the candidates
of the major parties?

Great Australians
Vote for Don Bradman's corpse?
Or is Ian Thorpe a member of this
party? Does Shaun Micallef count?
I consider him a great Australian.
Or, Edmund Barton was Australia's
first Prime Minister. We need his
comeback to get Australia back on
track. Vote Zombie Edmund Barton
for the Great Australian Party!

Fishing Party
I'm not sure what their policies are
exactly, but I sure do like the
sound of them.

Ungrouped
Oh, wait, this isn't a party.









Thursday, September 16, 2004

Tuesday, September 14, 2004

Friday, September 10, 2004
 
One of the reasons why I oppose any
form of legalised euthanasia.

While I can certainly sympathise with those hard cases like terminally
ill people in pain who just wish it was all over, I don't really trust a
lot of people who may at some point get the power to decide to
"put people out of their misery." What with all the nursing home scandals
we've been hearing about lately, do you really think they would only
euthanise those who expressely wish it, or might they conveniently
bend the facts a little for the sake of convenience and efficiency?
Not to mention situations where those who could decide whether
to have grandma put down like an old pet co-incidentally will also
benefit from inheritance? I just don't trust people with that
kind of "mercy."

 
Be my boss!
I've decided to have a kind of competition thingy for when I'm past my computer troubles.
I want somebody to give me an assignment of some sort. It could be something like:

An essay on some theme, e.g. "If a mermaid were a real creature, which side dishes would go best with it?"

A story, with some guidelines to get me started, like some plot points I must include, or certain characters to use,
etc (by character I mean something like, "apathetic record store counter attendant" or "Hitler youth bunny",
not anything copied from anything else like "Kramer from Seinfield" or anything.). Could even be something like
"A tale of a relationship break up from the perspective of a pudding."

A comic I should get around to finishing.

Some other weird idea you have.

And remember this is to get me started doing something, so I mean like 1000 or 2000 words of writing something,
not something novel length or a set of encyclopaedias, one or two comic pages, not a whole comic book.

Also give me a set amount of time to do it in. That will start after my computer troubles are sorted out, that will then give me a deadline.

I may not get done what you set me to do, but I'm pretty sure something interesting will result.



 
Been having endless computer troubles lately.
It's kinda random now whether it will actually work or not. I might even just get a new(er) one. It is kinda old. Well, some bits are older than others. But the advantage in being a bit behind in technology is that I find a lot of second hand and discounted computers to be really impressive. "Wow! Computers can do that these days?" I say to myself.

Thursday, September 02, 2004




Wednesday, September 01, 2004
 
Always nice to see snake-oil salesman keeping up with
computer technology.


Get a different kind of firewall with Ultra Spiritual Protection. "An advanced radionic
program that protects you against black magick, curses, hexes, sorcery, sortilegies
and psychic attacks."
But why be happy with just defense when you can go on
the attack with Chaos Magick Spell Caster. Or use your computer as a battery
for ethereal energy with the <>iOrgone Condensation Unit. Make sure to read the
testimonials and the FAQ (skip the technical one and go to the esoteric faq).



 
A commonly held myth about the Middle Ages.


We all know that Christopher Columbus encountered stiff resistance about his idea of sailing off West to try and reach the East Indies. Many of us have laboured under the impression that people were concerned that he would sail off the edge of the Earth which was widely believed to be flat. History is thought to have vindicated Columbus against those filled with the Christian superstition of a flat Earth who held on to old fashioned beliefs. A minority of people are even under the impression that Galileo's trial centred on the subject rather than whether the Earth orbited the sun.

It comes as some surprise, therefore, to find that Columbus was wrong and his critics were right - not because the world is actually flat after all, but because at the time everyone knew it was a globe and were arguing about how big it was. The idea that the uncouth people of the Middle Ages thought the Earth was flat is an example of the myth that has been propagated since the nineteenth century to give us a quite unfair view of this vibrant and exciting period.


Tuesday, August 31, 2004

 
Another Cringe Alert

This is the lamest Bible translation I have come across so far. Compare:

After Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist, he saw ‘‘the Spirit descending upon him like a dove; and a voice came from heaven, ‘Thou art my beloved Son; with thee I am well pleased''' (Mark 1:10-11, Revised Standard Version).

Compare that with this new translation:

‘‘A pigeon flew down and perched on him. Jesus took this as a sign that God's Spirit was with him. A voice from overhead was heard saying, ‘That's my boy!'''




 
Cringe Alert

New York's planned parenthood wants JK Rowling to include sex ed
lessons at Hogwarts in her next book. "For the Harry Potter
readers, just think of the possibilities:Snapes, that sullen, nasty
professor lecturing on the facts of biology and sex..."
Excuse me, what?

Wasn't there enough of Harry furiously polishing his broom and
wand in the last book? If it isn't, I have one word for these
people. FANFICTION.

This pagehas some titles for the next book based on this...

Harry Potter And The Adulterer's Zone
Harry Potter And The Bedchamber Of Regrets
Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Abstinence
Harry Potter And The Object Of Desire!
Harry Potter and the Order of the Penis


 
PRESS RELEASE
Chiropractors for Consumers Union blamed the Salvation Army for pooh-poohing the effects of lactose intolerance among habitual adulterers.

"Their elitist attitude makes fools of us all," said the spokeshominid, adding that habitual adulterers plan to file a class-action lawsuit in federal court asking $1 quadrillion in damages.


Monday, August 30, 2004

 
Rather disturbing divorce story here,and also here. Sometimes attempts to
simplify a complex problem like divorce can create even worse situations.

 
Kid Radd is approaching the end.

Friday, August 27, 2004

Wednesday, August 18, 2004
 
Interesting article here about the wankspeak that reviewers and critics use, especially with regard to books.


Monday, August 16, 2004
 
I passed my driving test today!

Wednesday, August 11, 2004
 
Maybe for my birthday I should host a cuddle party.

Sunday, August 08, 2004
 
Check out these cool robots. Isn't it nice to be living in the future?

There's animatronic ones, entertainment ones, domestic ones, walking ones and humanoid face ones, but they don't seem to have many of what we've all been waiting for- sex robots!

 
Just got back from the TISM concert
It was really cool of course. They had 'TISM idol' and I think they took some girls out of the crowd, and would sing a line or two from a TISM song, then a panel of judges (non-tism member judges) would insult them, except one I think they would suck up to in a really rediculous way (curiously similar to the real Australian Idol).And I think they called them all Laetitia. This was interspersed between the songs. TISM came out with big signs on their heads, one had paul, another had george, and I think a third one called ringo, and the rest said John (apparently those are actually the names of members of this really obscure band that nobody has ever heard of). And they also did all their usual stylish dancing antics and went crowdsurfing, where they got a lot of their costumes torn off. I think at one point, one of them, either Ron or Humphrey probably, was only left with underwear intact (they kept them on this time, thank goodness). and of course they lost their masks a few times in the crowd, and I was close enough twice to see their faces, so I've seen what two of them look like now. What do they look like, you ask? Well, just some ugly old guys as you've probably suspected, in fact they look a lot better with the masks on really. Oh, and I managed to tear off a little of costume, so now I have a little piece of TISM. The first supporting act was okay, what with the dancing girls and the toy keyboards and salt and lemons and powertools and whatnot. The second one I didn't really like. The lead singer was this big huge fat guy
only wearing gladwrap, thankfully with some fake hair sort of stuff to cover his genitals, but still he was pretty gross, and I was glad at that point some people came and stood in front of me, hiding the grossness. They did a lot of their classic songs, they even did the country western version of defecate on my face. And I got to hear the new ones that I hadn't gotten around to listening yet. I Don't think I like them quite as much as I do the Derigour Mortis ones. Now I might have gotten some of these details wrong or mixed up a bit, as for a while I was kind of being bounced and tossed about a bit throughout the crowd of the Mosh pit until I managed to maneuver my way out, reminding me again of why I don't like mosh pits. I mean, you can only take being drowning in other people's smoke-flavoured sweat and being submerged in some strange guy's man-bosoms so many times. I did find some nice calm pockets, and managed to find a nice halfway point, where I could, you know, not be crushed to death. Some people did help me not be crushed to death, and I helped some other people not get crushed too, nice to know that not everybody is keen to trample all over you. And beforehand I visited Shawn's place for the first time, so I was doing the thing where I walk around the house looking at everything in a way like I'm visiting the museum or an art gallery or something. Didn't steal anything though.

Thursday, August 05, 2004
 
Dark Shadows of the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement

No no no no no! This silly Australia-US free trade Agreement thingy seems to have provisions for Australia to fall in line with America's continuously-extending copyright laws, and their DMCA (digital millenium copyright act). I've been suspicious of this free trade agreement but haven't really paid much attention to this issue. I think our laws are enough as it is (like, copyright is death of author + 50 years), I don't want us to follow us to follow America's path of copyright and intellectual property laws, or their silly ideas about how to deal with this bizarre new internet thingy (with regard to the safe harbour and DMCA bit). Here's some links about
America's troublesome copyright hi-jinks:

Sonny Bono Copyright Extension Act

Opposing Copyright Extension

More on Eldred vs Ashcroft

Free Culture

And here's the text of the free trade agreement

Tuesday, August 03, 2004
 
If this is real, then I think George Lucas has really gone off the deep end

Apparently, he's decided to change the ending a bit of Return of the Jedi so that that the guy originally
playing Anakin Skywalker is replaced with the guy who plays him in the lame prequels. I guess that will be
the digitally re-remastered extra-special edition. Does anyone else think that all this retroactive re-editing
is getting just a bit silly?

Friday, July 30, 2004
 
Speaking of those wacky, hollywood-esque Religions...
After that last post, I saw on my blog ads up the top one was
about that weirdo 'A Course in Miracles' thing that my cousin
who is a witch is into. Right next to it is an ad that says,
'What is heresy?' Funny when you get a randomly made
contrast like that.

 
Got my TISM ticket today!
I had this idea today of how I'd like to add some new notes to our currency system.
They'd be like the current ones except with five cents subtracted, so you'd have
your $4.95 note, $9.95, $19.95, $49.95 and $99.95 note. It'd sure make things
a bit easier when paying for some things. It might make it a bit more difficult
when adding things up, so I'd keep the normal ones as well. Actually, it'd
probably be a pretty silly thing to actually do, I just get a bit annoyed at
the way shops make sure they never have a nice round number, they always
subtract like 5 cents so they try to make you think it costs a lot less than what
it actually does. I don't know whether that actually works or not, I know
that I always automatically round it up. I suppose there's probably
some study out there comparing people buying nice round numbers versus
those with the 5 cents subtracted. Who knows.

Why is it that whenever you hear someone talk about their particular
line of work, the first thing they say is, 'well, you know, it's a lot of hard
work,' or 'hey, it might look easy but it's actually a lot of hard work.'
It's not like you ever find people going around bragging about how
easy their jobs are. 'pfft. Piece of cake. A monkey could do it. work?
well, if you want to call it that, heh heh.' No one ever says stuff like
that. What is with this automatic defensive line that these people
are taking anyway? Are they assuming that everyone thinks they're just
slacking off? There are a few exceptions to the rule though. Like, I
was watching Girl TV today because I'm a filthy pervert and one
of the girls was interviewing this model, asking questions like, 'I know it
looks easy but do you find it hard?' (or something along those lines)
and he (it was a male model) replied, 'Nah, it's a pretty easy job really.
Not really much you have to do. Someone does my makeup and hair, someone
else dresses me, and I go out and walk around a bit. Couldn't be easier.'
The other exception is Billy Connolly. Once I saw him on this talkshow
thingamajig and he remarked that he hated it when you see people
like actors going around saying, 'Oh, no, it's not all glamour you know, it's
terribly difficult, not many people would want to do it if they knew what
it was really like, oh, yes, it's such a trial!' (with violins
playing in the background). 'Get your hand off it' he says to those folks,
and he also said that he loves doing what he does and would rather do
it than anything else.

Finally, some honesty! I'm glad that at least
some people with wanky jobs finally realise that you'd have to be a moron
not to see that you'd rather be doing their jobs than cleaning up piles
of shit or telemarketing and that they should stop whinging, shut up
and be grateful for once. Honestly, those celebs sometimes. They spend
all that time fellating their way to the top of their field, only to
complain about the trials of life being the cream of the crop. What, Mr or Ms Celeb,
you're surprised that wealth and fame is just that, wealth and fame, and not
spiritually fulfilling? Well, surprise surprise, you finally learned what
everyone has been telling you since preschool. All those sunday school
teachers were right when they said that those things wouldn't make you
happy. It's just that most people prefer to have a bit of spare cash around
rather than struggling to make ends meet, and have daydreams about the glory
of fame to take their minds off being a mediocre nothing that nobody
cares about. If you wanted to fill that emptiness inside, how about
saying a prayer for once? Maybe visit one of those church thingies?
And no, please not one of your bullshit hollywood religions like Scientology
or Kabbalah. Why not one of those mainstream ones? Judaism, Chistianity,
Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism? If I haven't heard of it or it's got less than
fourteen million followers it's probably not worth bothering with. I mean,
if your god or spirit guide or whatever has only ever bothered to tell
the secrets of the universe to your guru's little class of 25 and no one else
he (or she) is probably not really worth bothering with. It also helps if it's
a tradition that goes back further than, say, a year. Of course, I'd prefer it
if everyone was in the same one as me, but I'd just be happy if more of those
hollywood types joined a religion that can at least get a paragraph mention
in a general knowledge encyclopedia.


Thursday, July 22, 2004
 
Close your eyes and it will soon be over
I'm going through one of my periodic jealousy fits at the moment.
It's not something I usually write about, well, not publically
write about. So look out, dear reader, because it might even be YOU
that I am jealous of. It kind of annoys me that I get jealous
over really stupid things. Like for example recently I've been
jealous over some pious people. Well, I don't really know whether
they actually are pious, I can't peak inside their heart and
examine their spiritual life. But they project this image, you know
(for all I know it could all be an illusion). Like there's these
couple of guys I know like that. One guy, see, he already has this
magazine catalogue thing going, he's got the looks, the style, the
washboard abs, plus he's got this whole spirituality
thing going for him, like with his worship leading and stuff, so of
course all the Christian chicks are throwing themselves at him. You
know that saying or whatever about a cute guy being a woman's handbag,
like an accessory to make her look good,well I think these Christian
chicks want him as an inspirational postcard. I can see him now, in the
postcard standing on a beach, no, sitting on a towel, there's the
glare of the sunlight reflecting off his polished abs,surrounded by
hot bikini babes, and they're like got open bibles and he's leading
a bible study, maybe a big flower or something in the foreground,
and somewhere in the middle of the sky is some inspirational message,
or a bible verse, or the worst, an inspirational bible verse.

Besides Calvin-Klein billboard guy there's this other guy, and it's
even worse because physically he isn't any better looking than me, no,
he gets by with this personality thing, which is even worse because
I've got no excuse. How am I supposed to reassure myself when he's
there throwing his personality about all over the place? I'm like,
"well, you know, we're not all born looking like...hey! What are you doing?"
What really annoys me about those guys is the way they can get
away with all that dirty-dancing type shit with complete strangers,
but, of course, if I try it the girl's all like, "get away, you creep!"
But of couse, this guy wouldn't actually do that because remember
the topic here is these spiritual people. What's worse about these
guys is that they're so gosh-darned nice and friendly, they're all
like, "Hi Rhys! How are you going?" and I'm like, AARRGGHHH!!!
Competitor for female attention! DESTROY! But I say, "Oh, hi! Fine.
How are you?"

And then there's these girls that I'm jealous of as well. Or just
plain angry. The way they just walk around projecting spirituality
and purity everywhere, and the way they make you feel bad when
you stand next to them because you were imagining them naked just before,
and even if you weren't you still feel bad cause they're like up there
with the angels and you're like this dirty little worm compared to them.
And they're all nice and friendly as well, and I'm all conflicted because
on the one hand I want to ask her out, and on the other I'm like, no, I
can't do that, she's outta my league, on too high of a level for me. Then
I just want to get out of there and take some deep breaths.

One really bad situation is when you're in a class, or in a discussion
group or something, and then the spiritual girl will say something,
and everyone will nod their heads knowingly, thinking it's all very
profound, and I'm thinking, 'man, that was just plain stupid!' but,
you know, I can't say anything, because when I do everyone turns and looks
at me and gives me the nasty look, or the spiritual girl starts crying
and runs out of the room.

I get jealous of the way everyone will listen to every little thing
that comes out of this girl's mouth as if it was sent there straight
from God. Okay, that might happen occaisionally, but not every single
time! And she's like seen as this wise sage and everyone will go to
her for advice about their relationships and personal problems and stuff.

No one ever asks me for advice about their relationships. Oh sure,
I give it out to people, whether they like it or not, but no one
actually comes to me for advice about their personal problems, unless
they say something like, 'hey, I got this really weird rash happening...'
and I say, 'eeew, gross. What are you asking me for? Go talk to your doctor.'
Oh, wait, there's an exception to that. If there's a girl that I've been
rejected by, that will be the person who comes to me for advice, or the boyfriend.
And of course I say things like, 'yeah, I really think you guys should
spend more time apart from each other. At least a year or two. In fact,
I think it'd be best for both of you if you broke up altogether, you're
just not suited to each other.' or, 'okay, why don't you pretend to go
out with me for a while and that will make him jealous and want you back.
So we'll stand here in his line of sight and pash for ten minutes or so.
I'll probably have to grope your boobies a bit too to make it more
believable.'

And what happens? They follow my wonderful advice and end up getting
married. AARRRGGGHHH!!!!

So yeah, I get this weird jealousy thing happening, then I get all angry
with myself because it's so stupid. I'm like, hey, so I want to become
like this more spiritual person. WELL BEING INSANELY JEALOUS AND INFURIATED
BY THEM IS PROBABLY A STEP IN THE WRONG DIRECTION.

Oh, wait, I can't forget my best jealousy story ever, when I was on this
kid's camp, and there was this other guy called Rhys. And one day some kid
was calling out my name, so I turn, and he says, 'Oh no, not you. I meant
the cool Rhys.' GGGRRRRR!!!! I can't have someone being better at being
me than I am! Ooooh how I hate that other Rhys! AAARRRGGGHHHH!!!!!

Wednesday, July 21, 2004
 
Chuck Palahniuk is giving writing lessons
Looks like he's going to use the tutorials he has temporarily
on his site as material for putting together a book on writing.
Probably be more useful than a lot of other books on writing
I've seen. There's a lot of writers seem to get by on having a
good concept or something while having rather mediocre writing
skills (the Da Vinci Code, anyone?) whereas Chuck Palahniuk
writes very effectively. What I'd like to see, though, is for
someone to use the kind of techniques his uses to
write a very different book, a different genre with a whole
different tone, I don't just want to see a whole crop of Fight
Club
clones. It's true that there's no really original story,
but you can easily tell when a writer is influenced by just
one particular author. They become like a sidekick to them,
this miniture inferior copy that really wishes they were that
guy. Like the Wraith, tee hee hee.
I prefer the approach where you draw from a variety
of styles and genres, and picking up various techniques
from different schools of ideas. I tend to be rather
ecletic in everything, really. Wait, does ecletic have one or
two c's? Ecletic. Eccletic. Maybe I'll give it three or four just
to be safe. Eccccletic. Oh, wait, spell checkers are good for
this sort of thing, aren't they? Let's see, ah, turns out it
does have a second c, but not where I was putting it.
Eclectic.


Tuesday, July 20, 2004
 
My family are watching Australian Idol in the next room
That show is one of the biggest loads of wank ever.


Saturday, July 17, 2004
 
Was L Frank Baum a Communist?

Except from The Emerald City of Oz:

No disease of any sort was ever known among the Ozites, and so no one
ever died unless he met with an accident that prevented him from
living. This happened very seldom, indeed. There were no poor people
in the Land of Oz, because there was no such thing as money, and all
property of every sort belonged to the Ruler. The people were her
children, and she cared for them. Each person was given freely by his
neighbors whatever he required for his use, which is as much as any one
may reasonably desire. Some tilled the lands and raised great crops
of grain, which was divided equally among the entire population, so
that all had enough. There were many tailors and dressmakers and
shoemakers and the like, who made things that any who desired them
might wear. Likewise there were jewelers who made ornaments for the
person, which pleased and beautified the people, and these ornaments
also were free to those who asked for them. Each man and woman, no
matter what he or she produced for the good of the community, was
supplied by the neighbors with food and clothing and a house and
furniture and ornaments and games. If by chance the supply ever ran
short, more was taken from the great storehouses of the Ruler, which
were afterward filled up again when there was more of any article than
the people needed.

Every one worked half the time and played half the time, and the
people enjoyed the work as much as they did the play, because it is
good to be occupied and to have something to do. There were no cruel
overseers set to watch them, and no one to rebuke them or to find
fault with them. So each one was proud to do all he could for his
friends and neighbors, and was glad when they would accept the things
he produced.

Thursday, July 15, 2004
 
Mark Shea is coming to Australia!
Don't know whereabouts though yet, might only be Sydney or Melbourne or something.
have to wait for more details.

Wednesday, July 14, 2004
 
Gosh, It's a bit of a wasteland, isn't it?
I keep forgetting to update this here weblog. I come up with these
cool things to write about, and even write them sometimes,
but I never get around to posting them. Then, when I do
log in, I just feel blaaaaah and don't want to bother even posting
those things I've already written. Also been forgetting to update
the keenspace account as well. Same thing happens with that.
I've been trying to get into the habit of putting up a comic
every couple of days, but that just hasn't been happening.
I really need somebody to tell me to do these things. Or maybe
I'll set particular times for doing these things. It's not like I'm too
busy or anything. I'm thinking maybe I need to start a friendly
debate with someone, I seem to be most productive when I'm
writing in response to something else. Where are those Calvinists
when you need them? Oh, wait, I said friendly debate.
Haven't been checking on Smurflist for quite a while. Taking a
holiday from it, I guess. After a while it just seems like it's always
going in circles. Been more checking up on other people's blogs,
dropping a comment here or there. I'm tending to like following
different blogs now rather than email discussion lists or web forums.
I check up on Patrick's fora every now and then, it might be kind of
slower with less posts and less frequent posting, but it's higher quality,
what with very strong anti-moron rules.

Bec's got me hooked on the Oz books now, since she mentioned it at
Patrick's birthday thing. I've been ordering all the ones
they have in the library, and reading on the internet those they don't. At this
famous forty website they have the texts up to Ruth Plumly Thompson's
first one, The Royal Book of Oz. I don't really like reading stuff on
the net, I prefer a book in my hands, but I just can't resist these
Oz-urges. So the Oz books are joining GK Chesterton, whose
writings I also cannot resist and I read off the net because
I can't buy them anywhere. I've been meaning to read more fiction
lately anyway, since even after finishing uni I've still been reading
mostly essays and some scholarly type stuff. I want to get a kind of
balance between reading that and reading fiction, I guess like
balancing out the sides of your brain or something. Been meaning to
write more fiction too, seeing as I've been mainly writing essay and
journal type stuff, besides doing some comics. Did an interesting little
thingy earlier today, I might type that up and post it here eventually.
I gotta see that Return to Oz movie at some point. I haven't seen it since
I was a kid, and I think it was this film that gave me these freaky images
that haunted my dreams for ages. I've been trying to work that out for ages.
"Now, which movie was it that had the such and such?" I'd say to myself.
I looked at a few other movies but they weren't the ones. Then when I
started reading about Return to Oz, I went, AHA! YES! THAT'S IT! THAT'S
THE ONE! Can't get it in any of the videostores I go to. I'll buy it if I have to.
Then I will have finally resolved my childhood dream issues!






Sunday, May 23, 2004
 
Rhys desires to cruise da 'hood.
Well I finally got around to booking another driving test, so please send out heaps of prayers for me. If you're Catholic like me, you can ask Elijah, St Frances of Rome or Bl. Sebastian of Aparicio to pray for me too, seeing as they are all patron saints of drivers (among other things, see the Patron Saints Index). If you're a Raelian or Scientologist or something, put on your tin foil helmet and send a message up to the mothership for me. Pagans, Wiccans and new age folk can put in the good word for me with the greater powers. Atheists/Agnostics etc, well, you can't really do much I suppose. Unless you want to send me a monetary donation or something.

Monday, May 10, 2004
 
Hoorah! A decent webcomic!

Mine, that is.

I decided to use my keenspace account at http://rhystuck.keenspace.com/
I had previously scanned and saved on cd about 60 pages of this ongoing epic storyline thing, and it updates daily at the moment. Until it catches up to where I am in the story now, then I guess it will probably update once a week, fortnight, month, millenium etc. At some point I suppose I might fix up the look of the website a bit, at the moment it's just the default templates. At some point the looks of all the characters will suddenly change, as I finally decided what this alien species should actually look like (hooray for six-breasted alien princesses!). Before that I just used a human look by default. I think I might just leave this unexplained in the storyline, like the way some TV shows change the actors of main characters and expect nobody to notice, or like the mysterious case of that period of Star Trek history of the original series where the klingons lack bumpy foreheads.

Saturday, February 28, 2004
 
shoujo

This is something I wrote that is too long for the comment boxes:

Sometimes guys will seek out to be friends with girls first and then get romantic, but then it seems like some females think that unless you try to shag them within the next 24 hours, you can only ever be friends and never have anything romantic with them, so then guys like Bill will react to that, and might try to date a girl as soon as they meet in order to get in there in a chance for romance. Me, I think I'd rather just not bother with girls that do funny things like that and try to play mind-games with you and instead try to ferret out the ones that think like Shawn does that 'friends - then maybe romance later' is a better way to go. As for being overtaken, I think that is just the normal human background level of inadequacy and feeling that lots of people are probably doing way better than you are, rather than anyone in particular, unless there are specific people that Bill is thinking of. I know I'm not in any better position than Bill, I've got no job, no car, no woman, live at home with my parents, won't be able to afford to move out or get a car anytime soon, will end up with a big uni debt, and the world has not yet recognised my genius, not to mention the chances that I might go insane, with all the hereditary mental illnesses in my family. And all of you guys aren't really all that much better off, you seem to be also doing either the poor uni student thing, or are stuck trying to make your way with a pretty ordinary low-paying job. So whoever these people are that Bill is jealous of, I'm pretty sure we aren't any of them, so I guess whoever they are, they are probably sucky people I don't know anyway.

Friday, February 13, 2004
 
NO MORE WHEAT, RYE OR BARLEY FOR ME!
I discovered the other week that I have Celiac, so on Leader’s Weekend I joined the elitist little clique of those fancy-pants special meals people. It wasn’t really all that different, seeing as there was so many different foods, all those different salads and stuff. It was just every now and then I had something different like a piece of chicken instead of the meaty pasty thingies and stuff. In the past whenever I heard about people having special meals I kept thinking of those weird foods they have on the original series of Star Trek, like differently coloureds cubes and ambiguous looking goop and that sort of thing. Space food.

It’s kind of tricky this Celiac thing because even though something might not have wheat in its list of ingredients, sometimes wheat is used in some of the thingies like different kinds of starch and I think even that mysterious ‘vegetable gum’ stuff. So it’s easier for me to just not eat those processed foods and stick to the ‘gluten free’ ones. You’d think the companies would be more careful about that sort of thing with all the litigation going around. Like you see ‘may contain traces of peanuts’ on foods. Maybe that’s because those peanut allergy people seem to have pretty drastic reactions, like collapsing into unconsciousness and needing to be taken to hospital, it tends to have more of a reaction on those current affairs shows. “How could they let this happen?” the teary mother cries. Whereas for me, having wheat is more like smoking. You won’t drop dead tomorrow, but if you keep having it, it will cause a lot of huge problems later on and can kill you eventually. At the moment effects of it aren’t that obvious.

Maybe on the next camp I do I should do some reviews of all the special meals I have.

I think I might have been a bit sick while on this camp just passed. I didn’t realise beforehand, seeing as I was at home in my room, but being surrounded by all these healthy people made me think, “hey, I think I might not be feeling all that well.” That was on the last day anyway when I realised that so it didn’t really make much difference.

I’ve had one of these telemarketing people ring up when I’m the only one home, and they ask if they should call again later or call tomorrow. I tell them to call tomorrow, and as they keep calling back at the same time, this has been going on for like a week. I wonder how long this can keep going. Maybe forever.


Saturday, January 17, 2004
 
Coleridge
You are Samuel Taylor Coleridge, writer of
unmitigated wierdness, abandoner of wife, and
stoned for most of your life!


What Romantic poet are you?(except Keats)
brought to you by Quizilla


 

Sim World looking a lot like real world


It's about the Sims Online. Here's a quote from the article:


Alphaville, the game's fictional city, could have gone in any number of directions, depending on the arbitrary decisions of the online game players who make up its people through their chosen "avatars", or game characters.

Alphaville could have become a socialist utopia, a grand experiment in free-market capitalism or simply a reflection of the allure and the pitfalls of any real Western city.

As it was, Alphaville quickly turned into a hellhole of scam-artists, crime syndicates, mafia extortion artists and teenage girls turning tricks to make ends meet. It became a breeding ground for the very worst in human nature - a benign-sounding granny, for example, who specialised in taking new players into her confidence, then showered them in abuse. Then there was the scam-artist known as Evangeline, who started out equally friendly and then stole new players' money.


Friday, December 19, 2003
 
No longer a Protestant, not yet a Catholic
Well, I guess it's time to come out of the closet. After a lot of reading about, writing about, thinking about and praying about a whole heap of theological, philosophical, exegetical/hermeneutical and other issues, I have decided to join the Catholic Church. I hesitate to use the word 'convert' seeing as I don't consider myself to be changing to a different religion, rather, as I am already a Christian, I am simply embracing a 'larger' form of Christianity.

I seem to have gone through Chesterton's 'three stages of conversion:'


The first phase is that of the young philosopher who feels
that he ought to be fair to the Church of Rome. He wishes to do
it justice; but chiefly because he sees that it suffers injustice...I had no more idea of becoming a Catholic than of becoming a cannibal.

The second stage is that in which the convert begins to be
conscious not only of the falsehood but the truth and is enormously
excited to find that there is far more of it than he would ever
have expected.

And the third stage is perhaps the truest and the most terrible.
It is that in which the man is trying not to be converted.


I started off merely defending Catholics from the rather ridiculous accusations made against them by Protestants. I always thought it rather unusual (as Chesterton also noticed) that the people who criticised them the most didn't even seem to know what the Catholic Church actually taught. You would think that the first thing people would do if they were trying to offer a reasoned critique would be to know what exactly it was they were criticising. So I did defend the Catholic Church, but the idea of actually becoming one was the furtherest thing from my mind.

Then, I began to investigate more and more of what the Catholic Church actually taught, and found a lot of things that make sense and I could agree with, and even things I didn't really like, (such as those tricky Marian doctrines), I could at least understand where they were coming from and the reasoned basis for them, and there were other things that I could accept because I did not really care much eitther way (for example, I don't really care whether a church has guitars and drums and modern music, or just does things the traditional way, although on second thought I think I prefer the more traditional ways of doing things). I kind of reached the point where I could agree on an intellectual basis on the bits I didn't like, so I couldn't really find any good reason for remaining outside the Church.

And then, of course, was the third stage, when I had the feeling like perhaps I'd been duped, lured into a snare by Romish charms, quite an emotional resistance, and I looked for reasons why I could be wrong about the whole thing, but couldn't really raise any real objections. So, I've been convinced that the Catholic Church is the 'most true' form of Christianity. So now I'll be going into the conversion process for joining up (there's a period of time of having catechumal classes, then there's a first confession, confirmation and first communion, I've already been validly baptised by the Church's standards so I won't need to be baptized again).

Larissa wants to join up as well. I suppose dad will be pleased, seeing as he is a Catholic, although mum might get a bit upset for a while, as she is a Pentecostal and all us kids were brought up as Pentecostals. It's a bit strange, all my life I've heard the testimonies of people who say they were brought up in a lifeless, antichrist Roman Catholic Church, and discovered the joy of the presence of God in Charismatic churches, yet in my experience it is the other way around.

Sunday, December 14, 2003
 
This morning I woke up with these thoughts in my head: St. Nicolas was a Catholic Bishop. So what's all this "mrs Claus" business then? and: That John Rhys-Davies who plays Gimli on the LOTR movies. What's all this sudden "comic relief dwarf" business in the two towers? I think that movie also needed more ents. If there's one thing I know for sure, you can never have too many ents. If I was directing those movies, I'd have ents coming out of my ears, so it's probably for the best that I didn't. THEY'RE LIKE TREES BUT THEY CAN WALK AROUND AND DO THINGS! How could you not love them?

Wednesday, December 10, 2003
 
Hooray!!!
I got my results back today, I got distinctions for all my subjects. I was a bit worried about one of them, the exam for it was rediculously hard and I wasn't sure if I'd passed, but it turns out I did well. So that's it, really, I've finished my BA degree, so I guess now I'm qualified to be an elitist snob.

Tuesday, December 09, 2003
 
Schpoodle!
I've just about finished pencilling in Schpoodle, the comic I'm doing with Patrick. We wrote a script for it together, and we're both doing a version of it, and when we have both finished we can compare them and see what each of us has done with it. I'll leave it aside for a little while before inking it in, seeing as you never quite pick up all the mistakes the first couple of times you look it over. I've tried doing comic books several different ways, and I think the best way is to pencil in all the pages first and then ink them all in (if you're doing a comic book all by yourself, that is). It's a lot easier seeing as I make quite a lot of changes, so then the inking in becomes the 'point of no return'. I used to try to completely finish each page before going onto the next one, and that was a lot harder for me, it just didn't suit my style of working. It's 17 pages long. This keyboard is annoying me a bit, the space bar fell off, and when I put it back in I couldn't get the wire thingy in properly, so I left it out, and although the space bar still works, sometimes every now and then the right side of it gets stuck down, and I have to hit it again more in the middle or to the left to make it pop up again.

Sunday, November 02, 2003
 
Where did it go?
Here I was, typing away and I accidentally hit a key or something and the whole page of text I was writing disappears. It didn't vanish while trying to send it, which is what usually happens, no, I was just typing away and before you know it it's all gone. I must have accidentally hit some key combination for "delete everything irrepairably" or something.

Friday, October 24, 2003
 
I hope I don't get LEFT BEHIND for writing this

Ah...premillenial dispensationalism. There's a lot I could say about that, like its extremely dodgy biblical and theological basis, and the fact that if you've been in evangelical/pentecostal circles for a while now, you notice that the prophecies and interpretations made over time tend to change, the old ones quietly discarded (when it becomes clear that they probably won't happen, like communism taking over the world etc) and new ones proposed, often based on the same scripture proof texts, and soon after a world changing events occur, like the fall of the berlin wall or september 11, end times writers get busy showing how obviously the literal interpretation of scripture had in fact predicted these events (none seem to be bothered by the fact that they don't seem to manage to make the predictions before the events occur). In fact i might do some sort of research project, comparing all the old predictions to the new ones.

I remember them saying things like the USSR going to invade Israel, along with China, Russia being the big bear from the east or something. Nowdays, I hear of predictions of where the Muslim terrorists will next hit. It seems to me, rather than a scholarly analysis of what predictions the bible might have, it's more like using the bible to support whatever political agenda is on the table at the moment. These days I have to remember to check for Muslim terrorists under my bed instead of communist spies.

They do make some predictions that could be said to be coming true, that of general trends like the lowering of moral standards or privitisation or globalisation, predictions that Joe schmuck from down the street could make.

Going back to some of the old books, like Barry Smith and others (Barry Smith died recently, just last year or the year before or something) I noticed a few suspicious things, like the date-setting for the return of Jesus, which we are specifically forbidden to do, no one knowing the time and the hour, coming like a theif in the night (I suppose you could say, 'hey, that just says the time and hour of the day. Doesn't mean I can't pick the year! But that would be silly). There's also this tendency to not give any details on his information or where it came from and stuff, to protect those innocent anonymous sources, but Mr Smith assures us that he has the information in his files at home, so I guess I have to trust him. Where he does cite sources, it's often rather obscure things like secret masonic handbooks or documents written by Jesuits centuries ago, the sort of stuff you're not going to casually pick up off the shelf at your local library. In fact, I get the suspicion that for a lot of things in his books, he just plain made it up.

And the kind of theology behind a lot of these books is just plain strange, when you think about it. First there's this tribulation thing, but that's okay, because we get raptured before that. Seems a little too modern, american and comfortable to me. What about all those Christians in the first couple centuries AD, facing all kinds of persecution? Being fed to lions and being used as a human candle sounds a lot more like a tribulation to me, and seems to me more like what the bible refers to than our modern ideas. And what about all those Christians being persecuted throughout the world today? Of course, they're not really being persecuted, nobody's forcing to put a barcode on their forehead.

Mark Shea keenly observes:

For we modern Americans are not slaves groaning under the lash or persecuted Christians faced with the colossus of hostile Roman culture. Rather we are comfortable people with cell-phones and hot running water who dread the loss of American creature comforts. And so modern Last Days scenarios tend to portray an End of the World in which the surest sign of the Trump of Doom is an infringement on American Buying Power. Hence, many fundamentalists warn of the "Mark of the Beast" as a barcode on marketable goods or postulate as the ultimate evil some Vast International Economic Conspiracy aimed at harming American economic and political sovereignty.

http://www.mark-shea.com/apoc.html

And then, after this tribulation thing, Jesus comes back. But not for a final judgement, no, he comes to set up a thousand-year kingdom on earth, ruling with an iron fist, or a 'rod of iron'. A kind of totalitarian dictator. And that's fine for a while, until some evil people like the devil get loose at the end of the thousand years, so then Jesus deals with that and everything, sending them to hell and his saved to heaven. Seems a bit like a funny thing to do. If he's ruling, on a kingdom on earth, why put off the judgement? And what's going on for this thousand years anyway? It all seems a bit rediculous and pointless. It sounds, in fact, a lot like the same kind of expectations the disciples had about a future earthly kingdom, Israel conquering Rome, them at the right hand of Jesus.

So my view over the years has changed from the premillenial dispensationalism I heard about when i was 12-15 and is now a view called, 'Amillenial preterism.' The amillenial meaning that i don't think their will be a literal 1000-year reign on earth, rather, than the millenial kingdom is Jesus's reign both in heaven and on earth in the hearts of His people, from his ascension until his second coming. The 'preterism' part means that i think that a lot of the predictions made were in fact already fulfilled in the first century, like the destruction of the temple in 70 AD etc. The only things left to happen is for Jesus to come back, and have a big final judgement thing. Prophecies could also be fulfilled in the end times, like in the left behind books, but that would be a 'double fulfilment.' It wouldn't need to happen, but it's not going to cause me too much trouble if it does. You can find out more about preterism on JP Holding's website, here: http://tektonics.org/eschatology.html



Thursday, September 25, 2003
 
The Katt's Lair

Well it's one of those times when I don't really feel like doing anythidng in particular so I'm bumming around on the Internet. I'd thought I'd have a look at fellow cartoonist/comic/manga creator type person (whatever she prefers to call herself, she can insert here, some people are happy with a general title like 'cartoonist' like me, other people get a bit uptight about that, preferring a specific title like manga author/artist or whatever. I can never be sure what a particular person prefers, so I put this note here. Myself, seeing as i haven't been very productive lately, have adopted the new title, 'professional slob.' By the way, this 'blog this page' button on the google toolbar is something I think I will get to like very much, because so often you see something on the internet and I think, 'I should write a blog entry about that,' but then I forget to get around to doing that. If I have a book that I own or a photocopy, I might write something in the margin or something, but more often on a separate piece of notepaper. I don't understand all these people who write in the margins and underline sentences in LIBRARY books. I mean, that's just stupid. How are you going to remember it later when you return the book? You'll have to write it down somewhere else anyway. And seeing as it's NOT YOUR BOOK, it's VANDALISM. Okay, okay, enough about that. Let's see, oh, I'm still in a bracket, I'll have to close that) Kinoko's manga thingy on the Interweb and there's a handy like to it just up above there.

Now there's a note here about her use of manga distinctives, such as having to read it from right to left and using Japanese language for some sound effects. She was kind enough to have the dialog in English, which I think was very nice and generous of her. Having everything right to left, I think, is one of those things that kind of loses its effect on a computer screen. I mean, if you have the book, you see 'aah, everything goes this way', but on the computer it gets a bit strange if you have to scroll over one side first and then scroll back to the other. But I think It's really just one of those things that can't be helped.

Okay, so I'm looking at the comic now. It's one of those ones where the Artwork is so good it makes my best ones look really crummy by comparison, so It's kind of embarassing for me. It's more a matter of the final, polished look, that is, rather than the quality of the art itself. It looks like how a comic is supposed to look. With me, I kind of just vomit onto the page. If it kinda makes sense, and everything looks something like how it's supposed to look, it's good enough, because just getting anything done at all is a big enough struggle for me. There's also the unity of the look. I haven't read through the whole thing, but I suspect it look unified, that things will generally stay looking like the same kind of thing. In my comics I'm lucky if the characters look the same from one page to the next, not to mention everything else, like the setting.

Hmm, this man doesn't seem to have any nipples, which is another of those manga distinctives.

I'm up to about p. 7-8 now. These girls are moving into this guy's house, and he doesn't know why. I'm going to see If I can guess the plot. This guy declared he would start a brothel in his own home when he was blind drunk, and these 'working girls' are responding to the ads he put in the newspaper. I'm probably wrong though.

Oh, they're relatives. Perhaps there'll be an incest storyline? I'm probably wrong about that too.

Aha, adopted daughters, so it can't really be an incest storyline.

Although, Judging by other manga comics you can find on the Internet, or fanfiction, having an incest storyline or a high school pimp would be rather ho-hum, and perverts would be yawning and getting bored. So I'm glad this comic probably won't be going into any of that stuff.

p.13-14 This page features a very interesting clock.

p. 19-20 Tee hee, see here for what I mentioned about the importance of the girls being adopted relatives.

p. 23-24 I just thought I'd mention here that I wish I had 3 beautiful girls to clean up my house.

p. 33-34 Tee hee hee.

Gosh look at the time, I think I might go to bed now.







Sunday, September 14, 2003
 
Sooo...what's the difference?

After a few different events, I recently realised something that I find terribly amusing. There are certain people who will start to look nervous if someone (of Catholic or Eastern Orthodox persuasion) cross themselves, or kneel to pray, they will cringe at the sight of rosaries or icons, get nauseous the minute they hear recitations of form prayers or the mention of the words 'veneration', 'rite', 'ritual' or 'sacrament', and generally crusade against what you might call the traditional forms of devotions or mysticism. And with the same breath, they will then turn around and starting speaking in tongues, involving a lot of shouting, sometimes shaking and repetitive prayers, and fall down and start wriggling around on the floor. I can understand the kind of Christian, perhaps of a staunch Reformed persuasion, who equally rejects all of these expressions of Christian spirituality. What I cannot understand is the Charismatic Christian, with this curious kind of short-sightedness, as if they have blinders on, that they cannot even see what a double-standard this must appear to be to anyone outside their particular group. It reminds of CS Lewis's approach of 'Mere Christianity', where he says that Christians should appear as a 'unified front' to those outside, and focus on what we have in common and not our differences. I think that is particularly important in issues like this, because to the outsider it can only appear to be rather silly. The response of someone outside would be, 'er, so, uh, what's the difference here?'

Saturday, September 06, 2003
 
Grr!
I just wrote a really good post and blogger lost at all! I shouldn't have deviated from my usual practice of writing them out and saving them beforehand. Aargh!

Tuesday, September 02, 2003
 
I just remembered...
I might as well add while on the topic of Gnosticism, that Neon Genesis Evangelion, one of my favorite anime series's, seems to draw heavily on Gnosticism, as well as Kabbalah, a form of Jewish mysticism.

Monday, September 01, 2003
 
Restorationism

One of my numerous email accounts is subscribed to a couple of self-help 'pop psychology' email lists. The kind of things you get from them are very often quite amusing, sometimes veering into all sorts of things like scientology or detecting energy fields through crystals and all sorts of new-agey type stuff. I haven't seen any detailing the health benefits of drinking your own urine yet though (apparently there was someone with a stall for that at a psychic fair type thing).

Recently I recieved an email with some new 'finding your inner consciousness' or whatever type thing, and I noticed that it was in fact Gnosticism. Gnosticism, by the way was a heresy that existed mostly in the 2nd - 4th centuries that was combatted by the early church (actually, it was more like several heresies, although often with similar traits). The writer of the article mentioned something like 'this is the true meaning of the Genesis story in hebrew that had been mistranslated by Christians.' Which is really a quite silly thing to claim. Anyone can check out the Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek versions that the translations of the bible come from if they really want to. There's no secrets that magically appear when you look at the hebrew rather than the english version. Sure, there's always some debate on the different ways that things are translated, but any look at the different english translations will show you that the differences aren't as great as they are commonly made out to be.

It is more a question of interpretation than translation, and there is of course much debate on how different things should be interpreted, based on the differences in the original languages rather than the english languages, meanings of words and grammar issues, as well as all sorts of debates about the context and 'how those at the time would have read it' and so on. Yet even though there are different ways of interpreting parts of the bible, some, I think, can be automatically ruled out due to their sheer rediculousness. The Gnostic view seems to fit into this category, as it states the exact opposite of the actual genesis account. Just so you know what I'm talking about I'll just do a quck comparison between the Biblical and Gnostic accounts.

If you remember from sunday school (and if you didn't go to sunday school, I'm sure you heard it anyway), God makes universe. In this universe is a planet called earth, on it somewhere is a place called the garden of Eden, and it has the first human pair in it. God says: 'Okay, you guys, I'm giving you this planet. Just, whatever you do, don't eat the fruit on this here tree.' They reply, 'okie-dokie, you're the boss.' A little while later, Eve's walking around, Satan in the form of a snake says, 'hey, that fruit's not so bad.' Eve says, 'duh, okay, gimme one!' Adam isn't much brighter, because then he says, 'hey, that looks tasty, gimme one.' They get kicked out of the Garden.

Now, the Gnostic view says, 'well, actually, the being that created the universe and everything in it wasn't the real God, that was a lesser being called the Demiurge. He created evil matter, that traps poor little souls. The higher God is a good spirit being. All people's souls are actually the divine spark, that comes from this higher God. Now, the snake in the garden wasn't the devil, it was a being sent from this higher God, who wanted to rescue the souls of adam of eve. So that is why the snake wanted them to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, because that is the wisdom that will rescue their souls. But the evil demiurge didn't want them to have this secret wisdom. The demiurge then went on to create the evil Hebrew religion, with laws to keep people entrapped in his evil, material universe. Jesus was another being sent from the higher God to give the same secret wisdom, like the snake. And because Jesus was pure spirit, he didn't really have a physical, material body, he was more like a hologram.'

The gnostic view also says that God didn't make Eve out of Adam's rib, actually it was the higher consciousness and wisdom of Adam emerging out of him, represented as Eve.

You can easily see that these Gnostic ideas are like the exact polar opposite of what Christians teach, so it's easy to see why they were so heavily opposed. Of course that doesn't mean I approve of the way heresy has been opposed in the past, although some people do just make you want to burn them at the stake.

Now in terms of these modern Gnosticism, This is a example of restorationism, or primitivism, the idea that the original Christianity, or some issue etc within it, has disappeared or been corrupted, except of course for the particular person who somehow found out about this missing thing, and we now have to get it back or go back to the way things were (so we had to wait over a thousand years for the higher God to get someone to tell us what we forgot about). It never seems to occur to them that maybe it was a good idea to get rid of the Gnostic ideas. Often they do not even approach the question of the truth or falsity of various ideas, being so obsessed with just the idea of fair play. Letting everyone have their own say is fair enough, but when ideas are mutually contradictory they can't all be right. One must be right, and the others wrong. Or they could be all wrong, and something else right they hadn't considered.

Gnosticism cannot be true simply because it was suppressed. After all, the idea of absolute monarchy has been suppressed in the past, yet not many people are saying that are governments are corrupt because they have suppressed absolute monarchy and embraced democracy (they say governments are corrupt for different reasons).

This seems to be a common trait in a lot of new-agey people. They seem to think that the church is oppressing them or their spirituality, which seems a bit rediculous today. I mean, fair enough if you lived back in the days of witch burnings, or if you live in an Islamic country, but where's all the oppression in our modern, western societies? All you need to do is switch on TV to see that the church isn't really controlling society. Although I suppose they might feel they are alienated from their friends and family. Or maybe they've just gotten paranoid from smoking too much pot.

This restorationist idea is common in Christian circles too. People write books on things like, 'hey it looks like the Early Church did this. Nobody does that anymore. The church must be corrupt. Let's do this thing we've forgotten about.' I've done this myself in the past, and it's an easy thing to do. But just because something was a common practice at one time, doesn't necessarily mean it's appropriate for every situation. For example, I've read a bit about how baptism may have happened in the Early Church, and it says it's likely people were baptised naked. Does anyone want to start doing that again? That's one way to get people to attend your church, at least as long as you have some fairly attractive converts.






Friday, August 22, 2003
 
Bleeeaaaaahhhhhhh.

Is exactly how I've been feeling lately.

Saturday, May 17, 2003
 

The Latest Jerry Springer Show



Jerry: Hi and welcome to the show. Today our theme is, "I want my party back."
Our first guest is Mr Simon Crean. Simon, what's your story with Kim Beazley?


Simon: Well, Jerry, a while ago my best friend was head of the
Australian Labour Party, but then their relationship was over, so he left
the party to me, so I've been leader of the opposition ever since.


Audience: Booooooooooooo!!!


Simon: Aw, shuddup. You don't know what ya'll talkin' 'bout. Shut Up!


Jerry: Simon, we have a little video for you, from your best friend, Kim Beazley.


[video plays]


Kim: Hi Jerry. Hi Simon. I've got a little secret for you. I know that
Simon ain't treatin' the ALP well, so I'm comin' back. I'm takin' the
ALP back. My baby's comin' home with me tonight.


Audience: Booooooooooooooo!!!


Simon: That dirty [bleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep]!!!


Jerry:Okay, shall we meet him? let's bring him out.


[Kim comes on stage, Simon runs out to attack him,
the bodyguards hold him back]


Simon: You filthy slut! You had your turn!


Kim: Hey man, you don't know how to treat them right.
I gotta take them back.


Simon: You left man! You left! You can't come back!!


Kim: I sure do, I gotta clean up the mess you made!!!


Audience: ooooh!


Simon: How could you do this to me, man! After
all I've done for you! You were my best friend!


Kim: You don't know how to take care of their needs!


Simon: Slut! Slut! Slut!


Kim: I ain't no slut! I just gotta do what I gotta do,
know what I mean, Jerry?


Audience: Dirty ho! Dirty ho! Dirty ho!


Kim: Hey, at least I ain't so lame that I need viagra
just for the voters to notice me! Honestly, Jerry, have
you seen his popularity ratings? He's electorally impotent!


Simon: Hey, at least I ain't no huge lardball! Get a load
that ass! It's huge! Honestly, who'd choose that, over this?
[Simon strips to his underwear, and parades up and
down like a fashion model]


Audience: Put it back on! Put it back on!


Jerry: Okay, It's audience Question time.


Black Woman: Sistah, you gotta know what it's at,
you know what I'm sayin'? Giiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiirrrrrrrrrrllllffffffffrrrrr
rriiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaannndddd!!!


Everyone: Huh? What?


Homeless-looking man: This is a question for Kim -
how you gonna fit the ALP in wit' you in your trailer?
Or is it extra-Jumbo size? [half a dozen more people
make fat jokes about Kim Beazley]


Man: Hi, ma name's Kevin Rudd. I just wanna say this
ALP is too good for both of ya! She's a-comin' home with me tonight!


Simon: Why you...[chases him throughout the studio]


Jerry's final thought: There comes a time in our lives when
we know we've grown out of a relationship, but we don't live
in a vacuum, once we leave a political party our position is
inevitably filled with someone else. They may not live to our
expectations,may even be incompetent and need replacing,
but to come back again, like a dad who's all too eager to
'help' his son out with his homework by doing it all for him,
shows you have emotional immaturity and insecurity and
have difficulty letting go. So who should lead the labour party?
Me, I don't care, I vote Liberal.


Thursday, May 15, 2003
 

What's with all these good looking people?


I'm always surprised, not just at all the good-looking people I find that exist in the world, but also the fact that it seems like more are born every day. Where do they keep coming from? You'd think that the supply of pretty faces would be exhausted by now. I mean, there's certain things you have to get right, like the right amount of eyes and noses, and I mean, there's only so many variations you can do on the same theme, and there's so many more things that can go wrong then right. So why are there so many beautiful people? They should have run out by now.

"Sorry," comes the announcement. "We've run out of all the good genes. The rest of you are scewed."

"Awww..." comes the cry of all the pre-incarnate soul that haven't been born yet. "Why do we always get stuck with the leftovers?"

But no, and there's so many people who are at least moderately attractive, and so few grotesquely and hideously ugly. I thought we'd be up to our knees in ugly bastards by now. Where are the freakish mutants? With all the greenie hippies moaning about pollution in the environment, you'd expect quite a few. Or maybe there is just something wrong with my idea of how the world works.


Sunday, May 11, 2003
 

Not feeling too well


I haven't been feeling too well recently. I've been tired a lot, doing a lot of sleeping, had a woozy feeling head sometimes. A couple of days ago I slept most of the day, but I've been feeling a bit better everyday. I have this feeling like I may have brought it on myself by stressing myself out and exhausting myself. I'm trying to take it easy and not stress myself out so much. I tend to try to use stress as a motivator, which is silly because it doesn't work very well, it doesn't make me more productive, in fact I tend to be less productive, so now I've been looking at finding new ways to motivate myself. My default setting seems to be, "go back and forth from laid-back lazy mode to anxiety stressed mode and back again." Then there's also creative mode, that only seems to ever hit me by surprise. If I could take that mode and harness it, I wouldn't need to see-saw between the other ones.

My dad has an anxiety panic disorder, so I might as well learn better ways of studying and stuff before I develop that too, or one of the other many hereditary illnesses in our family (bipolar disorder, depression, paranoid psychosis). It's just that there's so many things I'd like to do in one day, but only so much time in one day. Maybe I should focus more on what I do each week rather than each day. I've only got one lecture each week to go to at the moment, as all my other subjects are education subjects, and aren't on while the Education students are on Prac, so I've got more time for me to get over being sick and experimenting with things.


Wednesday, May 07, 2003
 

Avril Lavigne Worship Album


Oh yes, how could I forget? Someone on the bus home from Arts Weekend of Doom mentioned that Avril Lavigne has in the past made a worship album(s). So I guess her original plan was to become a mini-Darlene. That reminds me of another little thingy I've been thinking of doing, writing Ten Songs About Avril Lavigne.I've only got the titles so far:



1. It's not so Complicated

2. She's legal now

3. Anti-Britney [or just another clone?]

4. Confession [I photoshopped you]

5. I know I'm not a Sk8r Boi, but will I do?

6. You're cute when you're angsty

7. Who needs a real girlfriend? Oh yeah, I do

8. If only human cloning were legal

9. Pr0n (this one I imagine to be a techno remix of Confession[I photoshopped you])

10. When I masturbate, I only think of you (I imagine this one to be a slow, romantic, backstreet boys etc boy band type song)


 

Arts Weekend of Doom



Recently I went on the Arts Weekend of Doom and lots of interesting things happened, so I thought I’d write a bit about some of them. Why,I’m only scratching the surface here!

I liked the fact that on the concert nights there were quite a few songs aboutoh-I-like-this-girl-but-she-doesn’t-like-me-so-I’ll-winge-about-it type stuff, (comedy ones, not serious ones) like there was Patrick’s nerdy teenage boy maths book margin poetry, after he did the goth weblog poetry one with Bill. And then there was also Bill and Stan and Co. with that stalker type song. And not only that, there was also that band with those girls and they sung a song that was like, a get-it-through-your-thick-head-that-I-don’t-like-you,-thank-you-I-know-I-have-nice-tits-now-can-you-please-leave-me-alone-and-go-away type song. It was sort of like on the same kind of theme, but that one was from the girls’s perspective. So it kind of all balanced out and stuff. Maybe there’s some kind of karmic principle there or something.


The drama people had some interesting improvisation things, like making up a verse of a song and acting out the randomly picked section of the bible, but each time they only got about half way through the people, then they must have decided they ran out of steam and sat down. Oh well. I was a bit disappointed though that nobody got a genealogy. That would have been interesting, with all that begetting all over the place. There was one that was a hard one to act out, I think that one was one of the introductory bits to one of Paul’s letters, where he’s just giving his greetings to everybody and stuff.


I was in Media, and we did movies and stuff, and that was good. I would have liked though to have known more about what was going on beforehand though, like about that whole come up with three words, make into a phrase, and have a film, omething written about it and drawn about it (or something? I dunno. There was really only time for doing the film though). Seeing as I did have other things I thought I might do on camp. It might have been helpful if our house party leaders actually came to the
Arts Weekend meetings. Or at least emailed us about what was going on. I felt like us other Media facilitators were left out of the loop a bit. We didn’t know what was going on. Oh yeah, and the collaboration with drama was good. They did the acting in our film thingies. I remember Jim Rawson saying that when SMADD first started they were going to do a musical. I think that’s an idea that could be resurrected. We could have one finished thing that all house parties contribute to. The song and music people do all the singing and music, the drama people do acting, dance people dance, art people do sets and costumes, media people write the script. Everything is supposed to have something to do with the same theme anyway, so it would just be more...unified. But some things have to happen before others, like the thing would have to be written before you could really do anything else. I don’t think it would end up happening, not on a long weekend (Arts Weekend) or weeklong camp(SMADD). Maybe we should all take 6 months off and go live in a commune. Although that might be too long, we might not want to even see each other after that long.


I’m not too upset though, because I liked the whole socialising aspect, catching up with some people I haven’t seen in a while, and meeting new people, including some people I had met on the internet, rather than the let’s-do-something-creative-together-part. Like there was that night when we all stayed up ‘till about 12:30
singing that same song in a heap of different styles, Jazz, rap, Britney Spears, goth weblog poetry, you name it. Another experience to be archived in the Arts Weekend/SMADD lore, greatly embellished in times to come.


That night when we had the disco thing, I came up with a new dance move: Push ups. I liked Bill’s like, whatchimacallit, video thingy that goes along with the music. Some of it looked like Salvador Dali type stuff.


I came up with a new character, Nutsack the squirrel (he carries a sack of nuts over his shoulder). Actually I think he was a chipmunk, but ‘Nutsack the squirrel’ sounds better, rolls of the tongue and whatnot. I also want to finish now this sequel to the ‘Meet the L33t’ comic I did.


Something rather bizarre we found in the bookshop was a Christian sex manual. You know, for all those sex orgies that Christians have all the time. Actually it was just for married couples, of course. Because, you know, they’d be there on their wedding night and would be like, ‘gosh, what do we do now? Where does this thing go?’ kinda like these people
(Notice this quote:


I am writing this while on our honeymoon. We would like to say thanks for your service. We even put a thanks in from us to you in our order of service!! Talk about GOD being in the meeting! May God richly bless your service and those
looking for God's helpmate for them. If you are looking, look to God first, he will lead to you in the right direction!


‘...I am writing this while on our honeymoon...’ WTF??!!!111 OMG LOL Roflmao!!11111). It even had some high-school biology textbook diagrams (Woah, man, check out them ovaries!). Although I don’t remember coming across
any Kama Sutra type diagrams. Maybe it only talks about the specific sexual positions that have been approved as being in line with Christian teachings. But which are those? Ooh, controversy! I can see it now, the next big debate on Smurflist: ‘Does anal sex glorify God?’ Okay, let’s not go there.


I just don’t understand why it is specifically a Christian sex manual. I mean, it’s like having a Christian recipe book (actually, there is that now, it’s called What Would Jesus Eat. I’m not joking, it’s in my church’s bookshop. How scary is that! [Almost as scary as the fact that the bookshop also has Jack T. Chick tracts. {Don’t you love brackets within brackets within brackets? I used to do it all the time when writing as a kid but don’t do it so much anymore.}]) or making Christian bricks or having that Christian Guide to tying your shoelaces (I think that was an Adrian Plass joke). Why not just buy regular sex manuals? What’s wrong with an ordinary copy of the Kama Sutra? How, exactly, is Christian sex so radically different from non-Christian sex?


It represents, I suppose, one of the extremes of the hey-let’s-find-a-way-to-infiltrate-
this-subculture type mentality, which, ironically enough, was exactly what we were discussing on camp. Like the difference between someone who wants to appeal to particular people so tries to act like them without even understanding them, so are kind of being deceptive in a way, and those who just happen to have the same things in common so they already occupy the same ‘subculture’, they don’t have to try to ‘Christianise’ it. And also how we don’t need to set up our own Christian subculture within a subculture within a subculture within a subculture within a subculture until we no longer have any contact with anyone else and exist in our own little universe. It reminds me of this scary statistic I heard that most people within two years of becoming a Christian no longer have any non-Christian friends. They just become absorbed into Christian ubculture within Christian subculture within Christian subculture within Christian subculture within Christian subculture. Of course statistics can’t always be trusted of course.

It’s almost as scary as these articles here on Christian porn (look for them in Too Much Coffee Man magazine no. 13.) It seems to be mainly about this guy from a Christian band, who became a porn star. But he maintains that he is a still a Christian because they are Christian porn movies (that’s one of the strangest oxymorons I’ve ever heard). They have all the normal stuff in porn movies (I’m not sure if ‘normal’ is quite the right word) with the exception that they all find Jesus in the end, realise that they are sinning, have an instant conversion and no longer have sex orgies anymore. Now, a word of caution here, this is the Internet we’re talking about here, so there’s the possibility that the whole thing is just made up. I find it rather hard to believe. Even so, even if it is a complete load of crap, it is still an interesting story. That’s the thing that some people just don’t
seem to realise about urban legends and hoaxes and things. It doesn’t particularly matter whether it is true or not. It only matters whether it is a good story. That’s probably also a good definition of postmodernism, but I don’t want to go into that.


I’d like to be able to choose the kind of things that go into the bookshop thing. I’d have CS Lewis, JRR Tolkien, GK Chesterton, Dorothy L Sayers, George Macdonald (the inklings and friends), and also Francis A Schaeffer and James W Sire. Oh, and I’ll add Norman Giesler as well. I liked his Christian critique of pantheism that he did with another guy, and the one he did on Thomas Aquinas. Sometimes on camps there’s CS Lewis, or even Francis A Schaeffer, because CS Lewis is the well known one, and Francis A Schaeffer, and his son, Franky shaeffer, have those books on the relationship between Christianity and the Arts. Now I think that Mind of the Maker by Dorothy L Sayers would also be useful, as she takes the concept of God as creator and his creation, and also the concept of the Author as creator. Other people have done this before and used one to explain the other, what makes this different is that she uses both to explain each other, so by the end of the book it’s like you have a new understanding of both. Some of Tolkien’s essays would also be useful, On faerie stories springs to mind. Some of these authors are hard to find, I think aren’t even printed anymore, Chesterton, Sayers and Macdonald. Oh, and JP Holding. How could I forget him? He has some books he sells on Amazon.com I think.

Now I’ve been noticing the weblog ads changing depending on whatever I’m talking about. I think I remember bill mentioning getting Christian dating services ads on his, which makes sense, tee hee hee. Now I’m wondering what kind of ads I’ll get now with this post. I might also get some of those weirdo visitors as well, like people who want to buy some of that ‘Christian porn.’ There is lots of other things I could talk about, but I’ve already written over 1700 words so that’s enough for now. Maybe I’ll write some more another time. Hmm. I probably won’t. Oh well.


Saturday, March 08, 2003
 

TIMECUBE!!!


Hey, did you know that the Timecube guy had a public
debate? Here's an article from someone who went to see it.

check out this bit...
Gene Ray began to explain his theory, one that he said he has been
trying to get people to understand for nearly 20 years. He says that
his theory will change everyone's understanding of the world and that
universities don't want to hear the truth. He says that authorities
at other campus' have threatened to arrest him because his principle
is so world-changing and threatening. The sad part about it is that
he doesn't seem to understand that the arrest threats never came
because they were "scared" of how the theory would change the world,
but because he quite literally does not have the "cubeless" words to
try and explain what in the hell he is talking about and he comes
across as some senile, crazy guy...and no one wants a senile, crazy
guy cluttering up their campuses. He wasn't invited to debate the
theory at MIT because they were open-minded...these geeks invited him
to make a mockery of him and he didn't seem to understand that
either.


Poor old timecube guy.

Thursday, March 06, 2003
 

Just Imagine If...


Imagine a world without lamers
Wouldn’t it be divine?
No more “Mainstream Alternative” music,
Reality TV,
Or Deconstructionist movements
Within Literary Criticism.

Human resources would become
Staff, and Information Resource
Centres would become
Libraries. Cafe Lattes, Tall Blacks,
Short Whites and Espresso
Would
All become coffee.

Teenyboppers
Would be
Domesticated.

There would be no more talk of:
Moving to the next level
Backsliding,
Unpacking,
Or comfort zones.

Government propaganda
Would be outlawed,
And,
Rather than elections,
Beauty contests would
Decide who rules.

Girls would always date
Their lonely nice guy
Nerd friends,
Thus, eliminating
Much angst-filled
Weblog entries.

Conversly, other nice
Nerd guys
Would date all the
Fat girls with nice
Personalities they
Never noticed before,
As,
They were too busy
Worrying
About their female
Friends who
Wouldn’t date them.

Life would be
Beautiful. So come,
Let’s lock up these
Lamers, and first
Begin with me.

Monday, February 17, 2003
 

Valentine's Day Comic


I did a comic on Valentine's Day, and here it is.

Friday, February 14, 2003
 

OH NO!!!


They've gone again. Honestly, they just don't know whether they're coming or going.

 

Hooray!


Ah, there they are, I told you so.

 

Come back,
commenty thingies!!!


Uh oh, Haloscan must be having problems or something again,
the commenty things have disappeared. This seems to happen
every now and then. They're gone on other weblogs too, I've
noticed. Don't worry, they'll come home soon.

Thursday, February 13, 2003
 

Prosperity Heresy


Jesus stands up on the sermon of the mount, and begins to teach
the crowd of followers. “Alright! Anyone want to be poorer this year?
Put your hand up! No? Well, We’re going to reach a whole new level!
You know why? Because you’re not millionaires yet! My goal is that
we’re gonna need wheelie bins down these aisles to take up offerings!”

“Excuse me, Rabbi, what’s a Wheelie bin?”

“Huh? Oh, something they have in the 20th and 21st Centuries.
Now, where was I? Now, some of you have some funny ideas
about why I came and incarnated myself on earth.
Something about dying for people’s sins. Actually, I came
so that you could all have life more abundantly. And that
doesn’t mean you will have a more meaningful and
purposeful existence, no, actually it means you will
have more material wealth here and now!”

The rich Pharisees: “Hooray!”

[A disciple comes up and whispers in Jesus’ ear]
“What’s that? Did I say something about saving up
riches in heaven? Sorry, you must have misheard me.
God wants you to give so that you can get back more!
What’s that?”[A little boy tugs on Jesus’ sleeve]

“Please, help me. My whole family is starving,
and my mother is sick.”

“Have you paid your tithe?”

“No, we haven’t got any money and…”

“AH! Did you know that God wants to bring many
blessings into your life? If only you could see the
many blessings that God wants to give you in your
future, but He can only give that to you if you sow
your seed. That means giving ABOVE your tithe,
because your tithe already belongs to God. You
have to give, so you can receive back more. Because
God doesn’t move or release his power unless
somebody first moves on earth.”

“How did He create the universe, then?”

“Huh?”

“You said that God doesn’t move unless
somebody first moves on earth. Then how did he
create the universe when there was nobody else around?”

“Listen, my son. You must step out of your comfort
zone. I want you to make it your goal to reach a
whole new level of giving this year.” [Jesus pushes
the little boy aside to his disciples, who give him
a new Christian’s pack.]

“NEXT!!!”

It just doesn’t fit, does it? You just can’t think
of Jesus as your typical charismatic prosperity doctrine
“health and wealth” preacher. Can you imagine Jesus
signing copies of his newly released worship album?
Or giving five essential tips for a more happy successful
life that will instantly solve all your problems on the
Australian Christian Channel? I don’t think so.

Rather than being based on a careful interpretation
of what the scriptures actually say, (exegesis) the
“prosperity” message more often comes from self-help
pop psychology books (I know because I’ve read some
of these self-help books and I’ve noticed similarities to
the sermons!) with a handful of poorly interpreted bible
verses thrown in to support whatever the preacher is
saying. (This is eisegesis, reading into scripture what
you want it to say rather than working out what it meant
to the people it was written to when it was written etc.)

If you want to know what things in the bible meant when
they were written I recommend tectonics.org
[but not tektonics.com , which is completely different!]
or the Christian Think-tank, such as these thingies here:

Tithed in knots
Fallacious Faith
Love
Hope

From Fallacious Faith:

Limitations upon what we may receive are clearly set by the context.
The Lord's Prayer instructs us to pray for daily needs (Matt. 6:11) --
it does not say, "Give us this day a Rolls Royce." Earthly children ask
for bread or fish (7:9-10) which are "basic staples in the Palestinian diet"
that were provided to children on a regular basis. We can ask for "good
things" (7:11), a term which sometimes referred to prosperity generally,
but also "referred to agricultural produce that the righteous would share
with others (Test. Iss. 3:7-8)." Neither the Jewish nor the Roman client-patron
background would understand the mountain-moving phrase as literal permission
to request whatever our selfishness desires -- or to expect something to be
given to us contrary to the will and desire of the patron.


I thought this was kind of funny as I have seen a church
service where the pastor said that he was really believing
and having faith for God to provide him with a fancy new sports car.

From the essay on Tithing:


Has this changed in the New Testament? Obviously this is
our key question for today, but it needs to be answered by
first understanding how the world of the ancients was vastly
different than our own, as reported in Pilch and Malina's
Handbook of Biblical Social Values. It should first be understood
that the ancient world held a concept of limited good, which is
in contrast to our own society's conception of inexhaustible resources.
Of course our resources technically are not inexhaustible -- they
just seem like they are because we don't see the whole line of source
and production! But for the ancients all good -- whether tangible or
intangible -- was in limited supply, and it was obvious that it was.
This was coupled with the paradigm of honor and shame, so that
any person who held to too much of the limited supply was viewed
as greedy and dishonorable if they did not "share the wealth" with
those less fortunate. Hence John the Baptist urges people to share
their surplus (Luke 3:11)


And:


If we are to take this illustration at value, then the principle is
expounded that those who have less than they need do not
need to give anything at all, while those who have more than
they need are to give away what they do not need. Indeed this
fits exactly with the premise of limited good, and the practice
of the early church: "And the multitude of them that believed
were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them
that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but
they had all things common." (Acts 4:32; cf. Luke 12:48) Not a
percentage, but whatever you had that you did not need! Of course
this would lead to a discussion, "What do I need, then?" but that's
a hot potato for one's own conscience and more detail than can be
provided here. However, it is enough to point out that vague threats
like Pink's (Who says to one who has lost much money and says
they cannot afford tithing, that things will get worse if they don't, and
who tells those who make even $1.00 per day that they need to tithe!)
are way out of line.


I like that idea of “limited good”, I think our capitalistic society
needs it as an antidote (hyper-Capitalists always seem surprised
at the idea that by amassing large amounts of wealth that they are
“taking it away” from the poor. After all, we earned it, they say, and
if the poor want some they can get off their lazy bottoms and get it
themselves, it’s only their own fault that they are poor, they say.
Completely unaware that there is only so much “stuff” that go around).

I don’t have anything against tithing or giving money. After all,
Churches, Christian Organisations etc and all their various projects
they have, must get their money from somewhere, don’t they? However,
I think that if your pastor’s sermons are about “giving” 90-100% of the
time (such as in my church, although it’s really one pastor in particular)
then there could be something wrong! Sometimes I get the feeling that
this pastor thinks that all the rest of the stuff in the bible, about loving
your neighbour, seeking after righteousness and knowing God (All that
stuff that goes along the lines of: "hey you! Think about someone else
for a change!") etc is all just a silly distraction from the single purpose
of giving money to the church! (I’d hate to think what a visiting non-Christian
would think!) I should also say that his few 1-10% of messages that are
not centred on giving money are usually good, and it is a pity that he does
not use those ones more often. You really have to admire his skills in
sophistry, it’s just a pity he seems more interested on spreading his own
ideas then those contained in the bible!


Tuesday, January 28, 2003
 

Twabistani Government
gains Internet connection


I decided to do a special page on my website for the nation I founded, Twabistan,
(that's http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/target=display_nation/nation=twabistan
if you have trouble getting to it)
at Nation States. On this page, there is not only the flag
and the country's currency, there is some pictures of yassichs
and the Coat of Arms. maybe next I'll think up the national anthem.
So far I've got a line of the chorus, "fair Twabistan, my Twabistan."
Maybe I'll make that its name. Maybe next I'll have a Twabistani
drivers license or passport or tax forms or something like that.




 

Fulfilment


It seems to be a common human desire to seek fulfillment.
People give lots of money to psychologists to complain
about how unfulfilled their lives are. People think their
is something missing from their lives, aren't really sure
what it is, so proceed with trial and error. It's as if people
think things like this: "I'm not feeling satisfied with my
life today. I think I'll try to find out if I can become
involved in sex orgies like other sad middle aged people
like myself," or, "I really wish I had lots of money to waste
on stupid things like gambling and drinking myself
to death" or, "what I really need to do is become
a scientologist." So now let's have a look at what
it means to be fulfilled.

What is fulfilment?
Something is fulfilled when it has achieved, or works
according to its purpose or meaning. Thus the man who
believes the purpose of the sun is to shine, when he
sees the sun shining, he is satisfied that the sun is
fulfilling his purpose. Perhaps at night-time he
experiences some worry, yet at dawn he is relieved.
The rock has fulfilled its roll when the coconut pops
open. However, the vacuum cleaner does not fulfil
its essential meaning or purpose, if it sits on the
ground in front of the door. In a way it has fulfilled
a purpose, that of a doorstop, yet it is the wrong
purpose. If the man never uses it to clean his floors,
we would probably think either the vacuum cleaner
is broken, and if it is not, that the man is a bit silly.
We might suggest that he give the vacuum cleaner
to someone who can put it to better use. In a way
it has ceased to be a vacuum cleaner, and has
become a doorstop. Likewise, the man who never
drives his expensive car because of fear of damaging
it does not fulfil the purpose of owning a car. It is no longer
a "car," it has become a trophy, for the purpose of a trophy
is to sit somewhere, be admired and never touched. Or a
museum piece, if it is an older model.

But let us consider another situation. Perhaps the man
decides to actually use his vacuum cleaner to clean
his floors, but instead of plugging it into the wall he
simply pushes it across the floor. Or the other man
takes his car out for a drive, but only ever drives the
car backwards. They know the correct purpose, yet
they are trying to achieve it the wrong way.

If we now go back to consider what it means for human
beings to be fulfilled some things should be obvious. A
person may feel unfulfilled because they are trying to
achieve the wrong purpose. Or, they may know the
correct purpose, but they are trying to achieve it in
entirely the wrong way. And lastly, the purpose for
human beings would have to be whatever purpose
the designer had for human beings.

Now we find an interesting situation here. If it is a
common desire for human beings to be fulfilled,
and that fulfilment means achieving or working
according to a purpose, then if there is no designer,
then there is no essential purpose, or "meaning."
If there is no meaning, any purpose will do. Human
beings are like the rock, which we choose to use to
open coconuts, not because that it what the designer
intended, but because that it what we find it useful
to do. No one will complain if we throw the rock into
a pond instead of opening coconuts; as an author
would complain if someone misinterpreted his book.
Therefore, simply the fulfilling of any purpose, just
achieving goals or aims for yourself will do. But
that is exactly the problem, the fulfilling of any
purpose won't do. There are numerous paths
before you, but they all lead nowhere. We are just
back to square one again.

There are some disturbing implications of that,
because it really means that the purpose of
human beings is whatever I happen to want it
to be (and not what each person happens to
want it to be). I might be kind and decide to
say that “everyone is free to decide what they
want their purpose to be”, however, if I happen
to be a rather powerful man, there is no reason
why I cannot say, “your purpose is to serve me”
because if any purpose will do, then serving a
dictator will do also. The only thing stopping me
from enforcing my will would be if I was overpowered.

So if we are looking for meaning, we are really looking
for a Designer, a Creator of the human race. It is not
enough to have a all-powerful God, That God had to
have created us for a purpose. If we are simply a
side-effect of God’s universe, something he never
intended, then looking for God would really be no
different then looking for a purpose given by the
dictator.

Imagine if a being came to tell us the meaning
of life. "Your purpose is to carve hollowed out logs."
It says. We would likely reply, "Why should we
carve hollowed out logs?" If it replied, "Because
I want you to" or "because it is fun to make
hollowed out logs" we could not accept this answer.
We could only accept the answer, "Because that is
what I made you for." so to summarise, we must either:
a) give up on finding any meaning or purpose for the human race
b)look for the designer of the human race

Next time I update my blog, I think I'll give a little
overview of some of the major worldviews around today.


 

Celebrate the federation of a new nation!


In order to try to avoid tax, I have formed my own country, The United Socialist States of Twabistan, and declared myself Lord Protector. What a scam! Visit Jennifer Government: Nation Statesand see how much dole money you can screw out of your local government. With any luck, you might appear on a current affairs show. Also check out the other countries in the region of Happy Happy Cupcake Love Shine:

The Kingdom of Lopsidia

The Queendom of Impractica

The Holy Empire of Miencza

The Republic of Codster


 

The Meaning of Life


I have decided to post here on this weblog a series of essays\rants\etc based
around the topic "the meaning of life." I intend to do this in a way that not many
people have, which is to actually EXPLAIN what it is. Most discussions of the
meaning of life talk about the history of philosophy of various ideas and schools
thought, while not actually coming to any particular conclusions, or saying
something along the lines of "Well, if there is a meaning, we cannot know what
it is."

Instead, I am actually saying that I know what the meaning of life is, which is
why I am calling this series of essays that. Some people might be surprised at this,
they might think me arrogant or ignorant or just plain silly to say I have a definite answer
to something that has baffled philosophers. It would be silly of me,if I was
simply promoting my own ideas out of my head. I am not doing that, for the answer I
propose is Christian Theism, or union\relationship with the Christian theistic God.

As for my reasons why, well, you'll have to just keep reading. Here first is an
introductory-type piece, on the subject What do we mean by "the meaning of life"
anyway?

Purpose and Meaning


First of all I want to consider the way we use the words "meaning"
and "purpose." These are quite similar words and are sometimes
used interchangeably. But let's first look at what is meant by "purpose."
We might consider a purpose of something to be what we can use it for
ourselves, or what is convenient to us. For example, we notice that we
need the sun to shine in order to live, so therefore you might say that
the purpose of the sun is to shine on the earth in order to keep us alive.
Or, if I hammer with a rock on a coconut to open it, then the purpose of
the rock is for opening coconuts.And there are some who would be happy
to stop right there and say that that is all that meaning and purpose is,
whatever happens to be convenient to a person or the particular use they
give it at a particular time. However I think there is another kind of purpose,
which is meaning.

Notice that when a person looks at a particularly confusing piece of modern art
in a gallery they may say, "Hmm. Very interesting. But what does it MEAN?"
Or when reading a book they will ask, "I wonder what the purpose is of this book.
I wonder what it was written for." In these cases we do not mean any kind
of purpose at all, we mean the AUTHOR's specific purpose. What the

author was trying to do, what message he\she was trying to get across,
whether they were trying to convince us of the truth of a particular statement
or arouse a particular emotion or whatever.

If you answered the reader and
said, "The purpose of that book is to be read" or "the purpose of that book

is to stop that pile of paper beneath it from blowing away", the reader would
likely think that you were being a bit of a smarty pants. In a way these
statements are sort of true. A book needs to be read. But that is only
because that is what a book is, something you read.We assume the
author must have had some reason for writing other then being read.
It is true that some books are written only to be read- and they make
notoriously bad books.

The reason why is that if the only reason
a book is written is to be read, then the particular writing within
the book doesn't really matter at all. A shopping list and a novel

can both be read, and could therefore fulfill that some purpose.
Yet for some reason readers persist in the strange habit of
reading more novels than books that consist of collections of
shopping lists.

No, the reading only provides the pathway
for the author's message to travel along. All really great
books have a particular purpose, a particular message
to get across. In that way, you could say that all great

books are "evangelical." What about the second example
I gave before, that "the purpose of the book is to stop
the pile of paper
beneath it from blowing away"?

It is true that being a paperweight is a purpose that a
book can serve. But we will usually declare that that is
the wrong purpose. It is not what the author meant.
To summarise, purpose can refer in general to any
kind of purpose for something, while meaning
refers specifically to the purpose of the author.

Next time I update my blog, I will continue this
train of thought with a piece on, "What do we mean by fulfillment?"


Monday, January 20, 2003
 

Finished Cleaning!!!


Phew, that took me like a week or something. I'm glad I got that done though. Now I can get back to doing normal stuff. I probably should update my website too, I haven't done that for a while. Maybe I'll wack some more more stuff up tomorrow.

Sunday, January 12, 2003
 

Big Clean-up


Recently I decided to give my room a complete overhaul. See, my usual method is to place things on every available space forming huge piles, and when the piles get too big I take them and hide them in boxes under my bed. I do this all subconsciously of course, I don't realise that I'm doing this. Every now and then I wander into my room and wonder where all the piles of junk have come from. So this time I sorting out all the stuff in my boxes and everything and I want to make it easier to find things, so everything has its own place. All my millions of bits of paper I've been sorting into file folders etc. This is one on those things I promised myself I'd do while uni was on. "Rhys," I said, "Okay, with uni you've an excuse for not doing it now. But when the holidays come, you're going to fix this all up." So I'm doing it now. If only when I am finished I can learn to keep doing sort of thing and stop forming piles of junk everywhere.

Oh, and I also have gotten a CD burner recently, a kind of late Christmas present thingy. We had the usual computer troubles when putting it in but I don't want to talk about those, and it seems to be working okay so far. We also got a new printer recently, not because I particularly wanted a new printer, but because the old one had broken down beyond repair. Or at least beyond repair worth bothering about. Some of these printers they sell, I saw one printer and the cost of the ink cartrdges was more then the cost of the printer. If you wanted to save money, you'd just keep buying printers instead of ink cartridges and would have a house full of printers. Only we don't really want a house full of printers, so to avoid that problem we naturally bought a more expensive printer. You can't beat that logic.


Wednesday, January 01, 2003
 

January: Book-Writing Month?


I've haven't been as productive these holidays as I would have liked, so I thought I might use the rest of them to write a book. I've tried doing this before, but I think I know why I never finished them. Last semester for one of my subjects for an item of assessment I did what is known as a Motivational Pattern.

It's a kind of psychological thingy that tells you (surprisingly enough) what motivates you. It's not like one of those personality tests, because with those you can only select between options on the multiple choice thing. With this thing it's this self-analysis process thingy and it normally costs like $2000 if you go to a psychologist to get it done. We had to do it on ourselves for assessment. The lecturer for this subject used to do this on other people for a job, so I guess that's why we ended up doing it.

Anyway, one of the things I discovered is that I need other people to motivate me. What I have tried to do in the past is lock myself up in a little room and try to be an individual and create on my own, but I actually need input from others. For example, whenever I work on my comics, I generally only get anything done at all after I get people asking me when I'm going to do another one. The more input from others I have, the more I get done. So here's a job for you readers, yes, all two of you (heh heh, when most people say that on a website it's meant as a joke, but here it's actually true) I need you to bug me about this and demand me to get things done. You're my boss now.

Okay, this is how it's going to work: I'm going to write 2000 words a day, except for sundays, for this month. 2000 words a day for 25 days makes 50 000 words, which is how long the book will be, unless I want it to become longer. I'm going to make it a rule that I'm not going to worry about how dodgy it is until I've finished writing it, I can revise it later. Otherwise, I'll just end up continually rewriting the same chapter and it will never go anywhere, that's what happened before. The only problem is I can't decide which one to finish.

At the moment it looks like it will either be the dodgy science fiction one or the stream-of -consciousness-set-over-two-days one. I've done the first chapter of both. Let me know if there is one of those two you'd like to see finished. I think I'll sleep on it. Perhaps tomorrow one will be easier to continue writing then the other.

I want to keep doing my comics as well so you have to bug me about that as well. I started a new one the other day starring the stereotype Christian youth boys from that review I did on that Extreme Days movie. I got the idea for this new one from a dream I had. In other news, I found this interesting thing about one of my favourite authors, G. K. Chesterton:

"The first Father Brown story remains one of the most famous and most reprinted: The Blue Cross. In it, a master criminal, the great Flambeau, pretends to be a priest and tries to steal a valuable cross. Father Brown exposes Flambeau as a fraud when the false priest attacks reason. A real priest, says Father Brown, would defend reason because “Alone on earth, the Church affirms that God himself is bound by reason.” Apparently this idea was too shocking for Hollywood. In the film version, starring Alec Guinness as Father Brown and Peter Finch as Flambeau, the fake priest gives himself away by ordering a ham sandwich on Friday."

From this articleon Chesterton.org. There's also an interesting introductory article about him there, while this website here has a lot of his books and essays and things. Typical hollywood. I bet if the novel was based on buddhist philosophy rather than Christian the orginal ending would have been followed. Oh well, As G. K. Chesteron said, "Religious liberty might be supposed to mean that everybody is free to discuss religion. In practice it means that hardly anybody is allowed to mention it," and "The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice."


Tuesday, December 31, 2002
 

Scientific or Magical?


well I'm back again, I was very tempted to just stop this line of thought and go on to talk about something else, but no, I want to finish what I started. Now, I ended my last little rant-thingy thinking about what makes a "magical" expanation different from a "scientific" explanation. I've been thinking about this and have been quite surprised that I don't think there's all that much difference. I ended the last one by saying that a magical explanation would probably be either (a) having something that works but we don't know how. (b) something works because of magical laws or spernatural forces.

First consider (a). We might imagine a witch, a horrid old crone, who knows that if you mix together, say, eye of newt with half a dozen tarantulas, monkey vomit and the hair of whoever who have a crush on, and if you mix it anticlockwise at midnight, you get a powerful love potion. You ask the crone, "oh good, I need that, but how does it work?" and she answers, "hell if I know." Someone might come along and analyse it and discover, oh yes, what this does is increase these pheromones here and blah blah blah. So then the magic becomes scientific.

Actually, this sort of thing actually happens. Not the love potion I mean. Honey, for example, was a folk's remedy for helping wounds heal, and it has now been scientifically verified. But the problem with this idea that it is magical and not scientific if it works but we don't know how is that science is actually the art of we don't know how. Scientific theories are more like summaries then exhaustive knowledge. It is only the fellow who only reads the encyclopaedia who thinks we've got it all worked out.

For example gravity. we all know what gravity is, but the law of gravity is simply a observation. It is as if you were walking along and someone says, "hey, you notice when you drop things, they always fall to the earth, they don't drift off into space?" and then you say. "Why, yes, that's quite true." But how does it work? well, there are some ideas like gravitons, but then you could ask, how do gravitons work? They exert a force? Why should that work? Actually, I'm getting more towards my second idea here.

My first idea is the holes in scientific knowledge, the fact that we have a general understanding of how some things work, but not completely. We know that a brain is full of neurons, but we don't know enough about how it works to build one. There is some "Well, we just don't know that yet" in most fields of science. My second idea deals with what you might call fundamental reality. There is a story that is often told to illustrate this.

A girl asks her father what holds the world up. The father says: "A giant turtle." The girl is happy with this answer for a while, but then comes back later with another question: "Dad, if a turtle is holding up the world, what holds that turtle up?" The dad then replies: "Why, another turtle of course!" And just like the first time, she's happy with this answer for a while, but then she has more existential anxieties and asks: "Dad, what holds up the turtle that holds up the turtle that holds the world up?" and it goes on like that until after the 4067 turtle, the dad finally says, "Kid, it's turtles all the way down!"

What that story illustrates is that when you explain things you come to something that can't be explained, because it is at the end of explanations. You might explain to someone how the sun shines, you talk to them about hydrogen atoms and nuclear reactions and things, and they will ask, "and how do they work? Why do hydrogen atoms do those things?" And there is only a few things you can do. You can go says that things are caused by other things and so on forever, or you can eventually come to something that's just there.

There is no explanation for it because it explains everything else. For theists this is God, for atheists this some kind fundamental forces and subatomic atomic that makes up everything and work according to fundamental laws, and the pantheist says that the two are basically the same thing. That brings me to something else that I was going to talk about.

Magical explanations dealing with magical laws or supernatural forces. If the witch is a pantheist, then really, what is the difference between an "life-energy-force" and another force, such as electricity? If everything ultimately boils down to a bunch of mindless forces, is there really any difference between "scientific" or magical ones?

Why not simply describe the forces we already know of as "magical"? It is for this reason that there are many people who are both atheists and buddists. They realise that the pantheist who talks about fundamental mindless (or near mindless) energy forces, or about the universe really just being "one substance with various modifications" is really talking about the same sort of thing as he is. Both say the universe is all there is, some prefer to call the universe God.

Although it would be different if the pantheist viewed the universe as having an intelligent mind, more like a theistic God, with the difference that this God animates the universe as a man's mind animates his body and the two being inseperable.

Oh, where was I? O yes, now the third possibility is that the witch might actually be calling for interference in this universe from a supernatural power, perhaps some laws of this universe are suspended to allow something to happen. This would be better described as a miracle. Having written this, it seems to me that I can't really say that there are magical and scientific explanations, although there may be natural and supernatural ones, the natural being what normally happens, the supernatural what happens when a higher power intervenes. I think this is probably what would be meant by magical and scientific explanations. Good that I've cleared that up then.


Sunday, December 29, 2002
 

Atheism and Aliens


Hello, today I'm going to talk about something I think about every now and then, and I think I mentioned briefly on a discussion list, which is Atheists who think that it is perfectly reasonable to believe in aliens but not in God (Notice that I said simply "God" and not "God or gods," which seems to be a rather silly habit that many atheists have developed. The reason why I do not add "Or gods" is that throughout most of history and even in the world today, "gods" worshipped by polytheists are usually created beings, who came about either from an ultimate creator, a God, or some kind of naturalistic process, so more like superhumans than an ultimate creator. It's a bit like a bunch of dogs who have never seen people discussing whether they believe in "God or humans." Of course you might say that there could be a minor deity who created the human race, which was itself, and the universe, created by God, but for what I'm discussing at the moment is God as Ultimate Reality, Creator of all else, rather then beings which were themselves created) Now, where was I? Oh yes. Now, I should probably add here that there are different kinds of atheists. Some atheists will claim "There is no God." This position is called "strong atheism" or "positive atheism" or "radical atheism" or something else like that. Now, an argument usually used against that position by theists (such as myself) goes like this: "To claim that no God exists, you would have to exist everywhere, because anywhere you are not, there might be a God there waiting for you, ready to jump out and yell "peekaboo!" or you would have to know everything, because unless you knew everything, there would be something you don't know, and that thing that you don't is complete proof that God exists. Therefore, as the athiest would have to be omnipresent (everywhere at the same time) and omniscient (all knowing), the atheist would in fact be God and therefore contradicting him/her/itself, and would then disappear in a puff of logic. Now, after this most atheists will instead claim the "weak atheism" or "agnostic" position, which states that "I do not believe in God because I do not think there is any PROOF of God, that is, I have no more reason to believe that God exists then to believe that unicorns/fairies/leprechauns exists." Now, sometimes what happens after this is that the atheist will try to smuggle back the "strong atheism" belief, by saying that, "Well, seeing as nobody really believes in unicorns, people have no trouble saying that unicorns do not exist, rather than unicorns have not been proved. So then there should be no problem with me going back to saying that God does not exist." Now, I have noticed that the same people will often have a more "agnostic" than "atheistic" belief in aliens. They will say, "Sure, we don't really have solid PROOF that aliens exist, but they could probably be out there somewhere." In fact, this position is more positive then the one they have towards God. The "agnostic" attitude towards God will tend towards "Okay, well, he could possibly be out there, but he probably isn't." While towards aliens the attitude will be "Okay, they may not be there, but they probably are." If you don't believe there are people who actually think like this, watch the movie, "Contact". The reason for this is of course there own naturalistic beliefs. They think that beings would have evolved on other planets just like on our own, so how many different aliens on different planets there are is really only a matter of probablility. But notice that they exclude "magical" creatures. You often see in science fiction little grey men with huge heads and large eyes, you seldom see unicorns. But surely if there could be grey men on other planets, there could also possibly be unicorns. The only difference is that certain types of creatures are put in the category "scientific" and others in the category "magical." But there is also some overlap, for example, you find men with pointy ears in both. But is this really justified? A couple of hundreds of years ago, the earth was not yet fully explored. When people discovered that there were no dragons in their own backyard, they could still reasonably suppose that they might be flying around somewhere in another country. But nowadays everything on the earth has been discovered, with the exception of deep under the oceans or the ground. People are more "atheistic" then "agnostic" about unicorns and dragons because after searching all the earth we didn't find any. But nowadays we have space travel, and we are in the same position as those people hundreds of years ago. There is unexplored territory. Is our expectation to find unusual creatures any more rational then the expectation of those who might look for unicorns? But perhaps it all comes down to whether you define something as "magical" or simply "strange and unusual." Because while the explorers did not find any "magical" creatures, they did find strange and unusual ones. They found giant bouncing rats and weird duckbeaked creatures in Australia, for example. Also, people have dug up the ground and found many strange creatures from the past. But we don't consider any of them to be "magical" becuase they are familiar and are no longer strange. Presumably the same would happen if someone did find a whole heap of horses with horns on their heads, they would become familiar and no longer "magical." Now, that I think about it, I remember reading in a book where the author (perhaps C. S. Lewis?) remarked that once nobody thought dragons existed, yet scientists now have dug up the bones of dinosaurs and we know dragons once lived. Of course, the scientists don't call them dragons, they call them dinosaurs (although that's only for land living dragons, flying ones are flying reptiles and swimming ones are swimming reptiles). It's as if the scientist says: "yes, I know in myths they describe giant reptiles with big batlike wings that fly through the air, but this is completely different. This is a Pterodactyl." Or, "Yes, I know the stories of giant reptiles with big teeth and claws that walk upright, but this isn't anything like that, this is a Tyrannosaurus." Language is an amazing thing. You can compartmentalise the mind, call something "magical", it goes into one category, "scientific" it goes in the other. You could say that the mythological creatures are different as they would have magical powers, such as being able to talk or make things suddenly appear or be able to breathe fire. But how is this different from the abilities aliens could possibly have? They could have communication devices, teleporters, machines that transmute matter, etc. The difference is that these things always have "scientific" explanations. A magical explanation would probably be that something works but we don't know how, or we do know how, and it is because of magical laws or supernatural forces. And I think I will examine these later, as I have been writing for a while and I need a break. So I think I'll stop here.



Sunday, December 22, 2002
 

Googlified!!!



Googlism

rhys is first big jeans for genes success
rhys is in the news again
rhys is the author of many short stories and novels
rhys is thrown in the castle dungeon
rhys is a good friend who you can always count on
rhys is working on two new movies
rhys is responsible for managing and developing the information systems at pugh
rhys is clearly amused
rhys is a somewhat older man
rhys is busy with late shows with kathleen turner in the graduate
rhys is a good player
rhys is looking forward to being darth vader
rhys is really
rhys is pronounced reese
rhys is juggling columnist for america's premiere family entertainer's magazine
rhys is a real people person
rhys is based in the french alps and spends most of his time travelling between resorts such as mayrhofen
rhys is so unfailingly kind
rhys is indeed the man she has come to know or whether he is the supreme con artist who helped destroy her sister
rhys is charmed by ann
rhys is a notorious outlaw
rhys is home
rhys is a certified public accountant in illinois
rhys is clearly at ease among all the excitement
rhys is also the name of a fictional character in a series of books by katherine kurtz
rhys is the big brother in our family
rhys is searching for someone who will hire his sword arm
rhys is a programmer at heart
rhys is gay
rhys is enthusiastic and intends to master python and advanced c++
rhys is the record holder for england youth caps
rhys is potentially a normal toddler now
rhys is one of two patients who have taken part in the hospital's first trials of gene therapy for x
rhys is nothing if not practical
rhys is that he comes as one half of a package deal
rhys is a master
rhys is hoping to return as a full
rhys is difficult to get at because her work seems so "artless
rhys is rather taken with something that has just dropped through the door
rhys is chatting with his girlfriend
rhys is one of the greatest authors of this century by
rhys is a landless knight with no money with which to bribe gwen?s guardian into changing his plans
rhys is the inheritor of a proud lineage allied with the divine power known as the living flame
rhys is grown
rhys is not a combat monster
rhys is the young son of bill & gaynor
rhys is a daddy
rhys is die waarmee ze aangaf dat haar werk zeer autobiografisch was
rhys is the baby of my family and lives with myself and mandy
rhys is currently involved in the revision of the standard occupational classification and is responsible for the writing of updated
rhys is undoubtably one of our most formidable
rhys is the younger brother of thomas ap rhys
rhys is a male border collie
rhys is the guy
rhys is speaking practical terms
rhys is a real landmark in the study of one of the twentieth century's most distinctive writers
rhys is thinking about what just happened
rhys is
rhys is generally considered to be the lead character in the game and is your standard "boy with a dream" type with a
rhys is an extremely intense and extraordinarily open actor
rhys is not like other men
rhys is just one of many thousands of children in the uk affected by a serious genetic disorder
rhys is another inveterate world traveller
rhys is the first charles sturt university student to receive a seeding grant from the apple university development fund
rhys is a family run farm rearing sheep and cattle and extending to 150 acres
rhys is married with three children
rhys is currently the organist at ormond college within melbourne university and is also organist of the malvern presbyterian church and assistant director of
rhys is an oxfordshire artist and a member of the oxford arts society and the oxford printmakers co
rhys is an edition of five
rhys is also the creator of murphy's law and has been nominated for several awards
rhys is a final year student in the faculty of social sciences majoring in international relations and double minoring in spanish and political science
rhys is the biggest sweetheart i know
rhys is saying
rhys is across the river
rhys is my second cousin
rhys is first on
rhys is the epitome of the confused
rhys is the author of eyelidiad and the tartarus press collections

Saturday, December 21, 2002
 
I tried logging into the iprimus website so I could fiddle with my website. It didn't work. Again. I've been trying to get into my website for the last couple of days now. Iprimus seems to have these funny troubles every now and then, like sometimes I can log into the website and sometimes I can't. I'll probably have to ring them up about this, but I'm dreading doing that because I know what's going to happen, they're going to think I forgot my password. But I didn't! I use it all the time! I know I haven't been putting it in wrong. But they'll assume that's the problem and they'll tell me my password and tell me to try it, and I'll do it and it won't work and I'll be back where I started. My mum wants me to change isps, so we can use a cheaper one, and I've been thinking about it, and wondering if I'll just get the same problems I already have. And I don't want a really dodgy isp company that will mysteriously disappear in the next month or something. I don't know, sometimes I just want to stick flowers between my toes.

Sunday, December 15, 2002
 

Dick Larger: Police Cop



Dick Larger was a gritty, hardnosed cop. He was so gritty
and hardnosed that tradesmen would often come up to him
and sharpen their tools against his face. Grind, grind, grind
they would go, in a pseudo-sexual kind of way. Of course
Dick was a very sexual man, he had a whole-lotta-lovin’ to
give. Not that he was a fairy-boy or anything. Oh, sure, he
might have slept with some men once, but that was just to
confirm that he wasn’t gay. “Are you really sure?” asked
Frankie, a certified homo. Without turning to look at him,
Dick took a drag on cigarette, inviting the noxious lung
destroying fumes to come in and play, a bit like how
Bobbie the pimp would go psycho at his hos and start
trashing his brothel.

“Yep.” Dick answered Frankie. “I didn’t enjoy that one bit.
Looks like it’s just chicks for me.”

“Well, all right then,” Frankie replied. “But if you
ever change your mind, well, you’ve got my number.”
Dick just gave him a slow nod, acknowledging his reply.

Of course, Dick wasn’t actually in bed with Frankie
at the moment; he was standing in the middle of a footpath.
He was just reminiscing, reflecting on old times long gone by.
He was smoking a cigarette though, although obviously
not the same one. He dropped it on the ground and snuffed
it with his shoe, grinding it into the pavement, although not
really in a pseudo-sexual way this time.

“You should know better, Dick. You’re a cop, remember?”
said a familiar voice. It was Yvette, his partner. She was
short and voluptuous with tied back blond hair. She had
really big boobies, that jiggled whenever she talked, so
it was good for Dick that she didn’t talk very often,
otherwise Dick would be living up to his name all the time.

“Yeah.” Replied Dick, breathing out the last tantalising
puff of smoke, which quickly flew into the wind and disappeared,
a lot like the hopes and dreams of his youth, or his pet
budgie that escaped when he was a child. A single tear
rolled down his cheek as he remembered his poor pet budgie.
“But I’m gritty and hardnosed.” There was a brief pause for
cinematic effect. “I have the scars to prove it.” He casually
indicated the band-aid on his nose. Damn those crafty tradesmen.

The melancholy silence of the street was broken with
screams for help. “Help! Help! He’s got my purse!”
An elderly woman cried out. Straight away Dick
pounced across the street. A car stopped inches
from him and the driver pounded on his horn. Dick
gave him the finger and ran across the rest of the
street to the elderly woman. The thief was running
down the end of the block. Dick smiled. He could
see the red “don’t walk” sign flashing. “I’ve got you
now, you dirty scum.” Dick whispered to himself.
Soon the thief had reached the end of the street.

“FUCK!” the thief yelled as he pressed the walk
button about a million times, despite the fact that
he knew that it wouldn’t make the sign change any
faster. He glanced impatiently back at the
approaching police officer. He decided to risk it
and ran across the road, despite the fact that Mr
green had not yet made his onscreen appearance.
Dick was prepared to do the same, but a bus drove
past before he set out on the street, followed by
more traffic. By the time all the traffic had passed,
the thief was long gone.

“FUCK!” Dick yelled.
“Not yet, we’re still on duty.” Yvette had a half
smile on her face. “Come on, get in.” While Dick
had set out after the thief on foot, Yvette had taken
their police car. Smart thinking. One of the many
reasons that Dick wanted to have some hot kinky
sex with his partner, but there was no time for that now.

By this time the thief was smirking smugly to
himself. He had gotten away. He had wrestled
a scooter off some pimple-faced kid and was
riding down through the main streets of the city.

“Hey punk!” Somebody shouted at the thief.
What? It couldn’t be? That policeman again?
He turned and was surprised to see the car
that had driven up right next to him. He was
even more surprised by the huge gun pointed
straight at him. It was in fact a Go-NutZ-2003
mini cannon, the latest in excessive law
enforcement technology. Made in New South Wales.
The thief’s head exploded.

“You’re under arrest!” Cried Dick.

“Dick, shouldn’t we have arrested him first?”
Yvette protested.

“How about a root?” Dick asked. With his corse,
unshaven chin, faint smell of beer on his breath,
and his cute potbelly, Yvette couldn’t possibly
resist him, so they had some hot-hot-hot sex.

Later in the courtroom, the judge stared at
Dick sternly. “We have seen the evidence.
It is beyond a doubt that you, Dick Larger,
have committed murder. What have you
got to say for yourself?”

Dick walked up to the front of the
courtroom and stared right back
at the judge. Dick answered the judge.
“How about a root?”

So Dick had a threesome with the judge and Yvette.

He still went to jail though.


Monday, December 02, 2002
 

Useless Trivia!!!


I just found out that the guy who played Parker Lewis in
Parker Lewis Can't Lose, Corin Nemec, is the same guy who
plays Jonas in Stargate. I also found out that apparently
he is a Scientologist.
Weeiirrrd. I also found out that Michael Shanks (Daniel Jackson)
is coming back in the next series. The Jonas character will still be in it
though, so there will either be a five member SG-1 team, or Jonas might
become a supporting character so they don't have to pay him as much.
Oh, and there's also a Stargate cartoon now, called Stargate Infinity.

 
It's Britney Spears's birthday today. Happy birthday, Britney.

Sunday, December 01, 2002
 

Deconstruction of Avril Lavigne’s song,
“Sk8er boi”



My sister really hates this song, so I immensely enjoying
turning the sound up when it comes on the radio, even though
I also find the song somewhat annoying. I also find this song
to be very confusing. Look at these lyrics:


He was a boy, she was a girl
Can I make it anymore obvious?


This is not obvious at all!
“Gentlemen, to your left, a bowl of cabbages. To your
right, six cans of motor oil. I leave you to draw your own
conclusions.” I suppose we are expected to believe
that seeing that one is male and the other is female,
a romantic connection between the two is necessary.
Yet what if I were a Freudian critic?


He was a boy, she was his mum
Can I make it anymore obvious?


But let’s not go there. This song tells the story of a “Sk8er boi”
Whose deep undying love is spurned by the girl he likes.
He likes the girl, for conveniece I shall refer to her
as beryl, she rejects him, however she secretly likes him.
However, this “Sk8er boi” becomes a successful musician,
and manages to seduce one of his groupies, that I
shall name Irma. Then Beryl sees him on a music television
station and regrets rejecting him. It turns out that
beryl is a single mother, and will therefore never be able to form
any worthwhile relationships with anyone at all. More confusing
is that the seduced groupie is actually our miss Lavigne. This
raises some interesting questions, such as perhaps some role reversal
is going on, as Avril is in fact the successful musician. Does this
mean that it was our dear Avril who was rejected by a male single
parent ballet dancer, yet later managed to seduce a male groupie?


He was a skater boy, she said see ya later boy
he wasn't good enough for her


Yet that is not as bizarre as the assumption is this song that
among those teen-aged “youth” type people, being a “sk8er boi” is
looked down on, they are a poor, marginalised, oppressed, repressed
“alternative” subculture, unlike something so cool and accepted
among young people as ballet dancing. What an unusual binary
opposition of sk8er boi/ballet dancing, as if those are the only two
options available and are mutually exclusive.


Anyway, wouldn’t it be the other way around? After all, what is the most
widely accepted stereotype of a “young person”? Why, it is the
fellow with the baggy pants and backwards baseball cap with a
skateboard tucked under his arm. It boggles the mind to think
that a guy would be rejected just because he is a skater with
his own band. More likely he was rejected because of some other,
unmentioned reason. Perhaps the above lyrics should
read:



He was a tub of flab, he couldn’t move his ass
He wasn’t skinny enough for her


There are some other minor matters, such as the binary opposition of
Sex drugs and super rockstardom vs single mothers, the idea that being
a rich and famous rock star is automatically better than single
motherhood, however I will not go into that as I cannot be bothered.


A question I would like to ask, so I will, is why is Avril complaining?
If she likes “Sk8er boi” so much, shouldn’t she be happy that Beryl
rejected him? If she didn’t, Avril wouldn’t get to go out with him. In
my view, only lonely single people are allowed to complain about
getting rejected by members of the opposite sex. Because if people who
are going out with someone complain, that means they would really
prefer to go out the person that rejected them, and the person they are
currently with probably wouldn’t be very happy with that. Who wants to
be someone else’s second choice?

For these reasons, this would be a more touching song if it was about
a grossly overweight mentally impaired short shy bisexual asian Muslim man
with bad acne, but with a heart of gold who just wants to be loved, but is
hated by everybody and has no friends let alone a girlfriend, and is chased
out of the village by an angry mob armed with flaming torches and cattle prods
and is forced to live out the rest of his life in a lonely cave in the middle
of Antarctica. But of course many songs have already been written on
that theme so this song would be unnecessary.


Thursday, November 28, 2002
 

I am Finished!


Well I've finished my last assignment for this year so I am officially

on holidays now. I'm working on some thingies that I might stick up

here so keep an eye out for that when I do them. Oh, did I mention

that I failed my driving test? I'm not quite sure why though, I mean,

there were only six deaths, the rest were just seriously injured.

Starting the car in drive when it should have been in reverse

probably didn't help either. Should be getting those extra channels on

Optus on sunday, I think it is. I was hoping they'd have Dr Who on

UK TV but it doesn't seem to be on at the moment. Dr Who,

Red Dwarf, Blake's 7, that's basically all I want from UK TV.

What do they think I need to watch? Eastenders? Silly

Pay TV people. They're also getting rid of the Oh! Channel because

"similar programming is on other channels." But the other channels

don't have that six hours of M*A*S*H on weekends. Maybe that's a

good thing, It means I might stop having dreams that I am a surgeon

in the Korean war. Heh heh, what I've just written reminds me of this.

Hooray for pathetic nerd things. Hmm, sometimes my commenty things

don't appear on the page, although when I reload the page they come back.

Sometimes they are there, sometimes they are not. It must be one of those

strange internetty vanishing and reappearing tricks.

Wednesday, November 27, 2002
 
AHA!!! It is all worky now! I have commenty Thingigumummies! The Super Net- tacky-ular Webstravaganza is complete, for now.

Tuesday, November 26, 2002
 
Maybe I'll try a new entry.

 
Okay let's see if I've got this comment thingy working. I'll try this again.

Monday, November 25, 2002
 

BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!


I've been kind of sick at the moment. I've got a dizzy, lightheaded head

and I start to feel tired after reading or looking at something for longer

than two minutes, which is annoying because that is how I spend most

of my day. It makes studying and staring at people who walk past my

house a lot harder than it normally is. I saw the Doctor and he prescribed

me some pills and they make my tummy feel funny, especially when I've

just eaten food, which is also annyoing because these pills can only be

taken while eating food. I also got a nose spray for spraying up my nostrils

and some soap for soaping up my acme acne-infested face. I hope I don't

get them all mixed up. I had thought of some really wonderful hilarious things

to write up here this morning, but I forgot them before getting a chance to write

them done. I was in that wonderful state halfway between being awake and

asleep. The only thing I can remember is an idea for a new boardgame,

"Getting laid." It sounded like a great idea at the time but now it seems

a bit lame. That's a bit of a relief actually, it means my other great ideas

were probably lame as well, so it's a good thing I went ahead and forgot them.

Thursday, November 07, 2002
 
I'm wearing pants at the moment
I just had some chick in Egypt start talking to me on ICQ. She started talking in French it looked like, and when I replied she switched to talking in English. I just realised I wrote the word "talking" when I should have written, "writing" or "typing" but I've decided I'm just not going to think about that. Anyway, she was wrting with that kind of English that looks like someone is reading out of a french/english dictionary or something. You know what I mean, when someone can kind of understand the language but not quite. Which was quite funny actually because the conversation was even more strange then my usual conversations because I'm sure she didn't really know what I was talking about, and I had no idea what she was talking about either. It was a bit like talking to one of those random word generator thingies. In other news today, something interesting I discovered that there was something called AfterMash. You see, when the last series of M*A*S*H was made, most of the actors, planning to move into retirement homes, voted to end the show that season, except for three, those who played Col. Potter, Kinger and Father Mulcahy. These three, wondering where their next meal was coming from, decided to make a show about what happened to the characters after the Korean war. So in the show the three of them decide to work in a hospital together. It went for two seasons. One thing you have to say for Americans: They sure do know how do flog the dried old bones of a dead horse. I mean, the Korean War only went for like 3 or 4 years, and MASH went for like, 11. I also found out that Klinger's bra was a Miss Highrise size 36B. So much useful information on the interweb.

Wednesday, October 30, 2002
 
INSERT HEADLINE HERE

I'm at the CHC library today and I've just borrowed a big pile of books I need for my numerous assignments. You probably won't be hearing much from me for the next three weeks. This computer's doing weird things. The mouse buttons are way too sensitive and it keeps clicking all the time when I don't want it too. No, mouse, don't click over there, I keep saying to myself. There is a girl typing emails next to and she's typing really fast and making me feel kind of inadequate right now. Nothing much has been happening recently. Not like the last time I went to the library, when this bird flew in through the window and started wacking its head against the glass of a closed window trying to get out again. So I picked it up and took it outside and let it go. I had to keep telling it to keep quite. Didn't it know it was in a library? I think I'm going to stop typing now because I've run out of things to say, and also somebody might want to use this computer for something that is actual useful. Actually, now that I think of it, they probably won't, I've only seen people typing emails in hotmail today, so there you go.

Tuesday, October 22, 2002
 
Weeeeeellll I've finally gotten around to actually putting some new stuff on my website, two articles I wrote recently, Lower Your Standards and e-XXXX-ttTTTttttttRRRRrrrrRrrEEeEeeEEmMMmmMMMMmeeEEEEeeee Days.Go check them out NOW.

Monday, October 21, 2002
 
Testing. 1,2,3...Hello hello.