Rhys Tuck: A Man Alive With Two Legs

Dedicated to the ill-fated visionary biped.

Stats
Theology: Christian Theist
Philosophy: Thomist
Epistemology and Axiology: Objectivist, Limited Absolutism
Predestination: Molinist
Soteriology: Inclusivist
Eschatology: Amillennial Preterist
Political Stance: Pantisocratist
Economic Stance: Distributist
Myers-Briggs/Keirsey Type: INTP

Non-enemies
Patrick gets jiggy wit' it
Boo-tay-licious Bill
Shawni 100%!
Candy boys
X-treme

Tibby the Tyborg
J-Law: She's still Jenny from the block
Jonathan Logan Live!
Stan goes wild!
Kinoko something something
GK Chesterton's Blog

Favourite Christian Writers
CS Lewis
JRR Tolkien
GK Chesterton
Dorothy L Sayers
George Macdonald
Fyodor Dostoevsky
John Milton
Coleridge
Oscar Wilde

Apologists, Theologians and Philosophers
Thomas Aquinas
Glenn Miller
JP Holding
Dave Armstrong
James W Sire
Francis A Schaeffer
Phillip E Johnson
FC Copleston

Etc
Tweb
Project Gutenburg
AiG

Fruitcakes with Nuts
Gene Ray
Alex Chiu
Emotion Eric

Please click here for extreme pain


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Sunday, October 24, 2004
 
An ironic case of unintended consequences

Heh heh, for years, paranoid fundamentalist Christians have droned on
about the horrors of halloween, how it turns young children into
sex-orgy-animal-sacrificing-satan-worshippers, etc (Strange how
much they go on about it over here when I don't usually see it
happen here in Australia, it's such an American thing). Now
this school has decided to cancel it's halloween celebrations,
not because of pissing off the Harry-Potter-bookburning crowd,
no, instead because they're afraid they might offend actual witches!

Monday, October 11, 2004
 
Here I wrote:

Becoming unemployed sure is a full time job.
I need a holiday from being unemployed. If only
I could find someone to lend me their job for a
couple of weeks, then I could go back to being
unemployed refreshed and rejuvenated.


It looks like my prayers have been answered,
in a way. Today I got a letter for...Jury duty!
That's something interesting to look forward to.
Plus, I don't have any valid excuses for getting
out of it.

Wednesday, September 29, 2004
 
Anyone else remember this? Posted by Hello


 
Aww! Look at this cute kid! Posted by Hello


Saturday, September 25, 2004


 
The other candidates

Let's have a look at some of our senate candidates for
queesland.

Socialist Alliance
I guess you'd vote for these guys if you'd feel more safe
with secret police everywhere and the security of the gulag.
Or maybe for the shutdown of oppressive religious
institutions like the Salvation Army and St Vincent De Paul's,
or starting a weapons pileup for a new cold war
are selling points. On the plus side, you'd get to have
some fun slaugtering them nasty capitalist pigdogs.
What's interesting is that according to this page,
one of them is a lecturer, and the other is a student.

Liberals for Forests

This is an intersting one. It's not the
'anti-deforestation party' or something else, but people who
have gone, well, I like being a liberal, but on the other hand,
I do like having trees around. I know! I'll be a Liberal for
forests!' Maybe these guys thought that the
greens were getting all the environmental
issue votes, but were too far on the left on other
issues, so decided to make a more conservative
alternative. That's my guess, anyway, and I
can't be bothered actually looking them up. One
is an economist, the other an econometrician.
I've never heard of an econometrician, and I'm
not sure what the difference is to being an
economist.

Hemp
Like pot? Wish it was legal? In that case, you know
where your vote is going. One is an Artist/poet,
the other is unemployed. One of them is the guy
that changed his name to Guy Freemarijuana.

Citizens Electoral Coucil

I wonder what these guys stand for. Vote
for us and we'll have more elections? Less
elections? More well regulated elections?
Maybe replace traditional ballot voting with
a boxing match between the candidates
of the major parties?

Great Australians
Vote for Don Bradman's corpse?
Or is Ian Thorpe a member of this
party? Does Shaun Micallef count?
I consider him a great Australian.
Or, Edmund Barton was Australia's
first Prime Minister. We need his
comeback to get Australia back on
track. Vote Zombie Edmund Barton
for the Great Australian Party!

Fishing Party
I'm not sure what their policies are
exactly, but I sure do like the
sound of them.

Ungrouped
Oh, wait, this isn't a party.









Thursday, September 16, 2004

Tuesday, September 14, 2004

Friday, September 10, 2004
 
One of the reasons why I oppose any
form of legalised euthanasia.

While I can certainly sympathise with those hard cases like terminally
ill people in pain who just wish it was all over, I don't really trust a
lot of people who may at some point get the power to decide to
"put people out of their misery." What with all the nursing home scandals
we've been hearing about lately, do you really think they would only
euthanise those who expressely wish it, or might they conveniently
bend the facts a little for the sake of convenience and efficiency?
Not to mention situations where those who could decide whether
to have grandma put down like an old pet co-incidentally will also
benefit from inheritance? I just don't trust people with that
kind of "mercy."

 
Be my boss!
I've decided to have a kind of competition thingy for when I'm past my computer troubles.
I want somebody to give me an assignment of some sort. It could be something like:

An essay on some theme, e.g. "If a mermaid were a real creature, which side dishes would go best with it?"

A story, with some guidelines to get me started, like some plot points I must include, or certain characters to use,
etc (by character I mean something like, "apathetic record store counter attendant" or "Hitler youth bunny",
not anything copied from anything else like "Kramer from Seinfield" or anything.). Could even be something like
"A tale of a relationship break up from the perspective of a pudding."

A comic I should get around to finishing.

Some other weird idea you have.

And remember this is to get me started doing something, so I mean like 1000 or 2000 words of writing something,
not something novel length or a set of encyclopaedias, one or two comic pages, not a whole comic book.

Also give me a set amount of time to do it in. That will start after my computer troubles are sorted out, that will then give me a deadline.

I may not get done what you set me to do, but I'm pretty sure something interesting will result.



 
Been having endless computer troubles lately.
It's kinda random now whether it will actually work or not. I might even just get a new(er) one. It is kinda old. Well, some bits are older than others. But the advantage in being a bit behind in technology is that I find a lot of second hand and discounted computers to be really impressive. "Wow! Computers can do that these days?" I say to myself.

Thursday, September 02, 2004




Wednesday, September 01, 2004
 
Always nice to see snake-oil salesman keeping up with
computer technology.


Get a different kind of firewall with Ultra Spiritual Protection. "An advanced radionic
program that protects you against black magick, curses, hexes, sorcery, sortilegies
and psychic attacks."
But why be happy with just defense when you can go on
the attack with Chaos Magick Spell Caster. Or use your computer as a battery
for ethereal energy with the <>iOrgone Condensation Unit. Make sure to read the
testimonials and the FAQ (skip the technical one and go to the esoteric faq).



 
A commonly held myth about the Middle Ages.


We all know that Christopher Columbus encountered stiff resistance about his idea of sailing off West to try and reach the East Indies. Many of us have laboured under the impression that people were concerned that he would sail off the edge of the Earth which was widely believed to be flat. History is thought to have vindicated Columbus against those filled with the Christian superstition of a flat Earth who held on to old fashioned beliefs. A minority of people are even under the impression that Galileo's trial centred on the subject rather than whether the Earth orbited the sun.

It comes as some surprise, therefore, to find that Columbus was wrong and his critics were right - not because the world is actually flat after all, but because at the time everyone knew it was a globe and were arguing about how big it was. The idea that the uncouth people of the Middle Ages thought the Earth was flat is an example of the myth that has been propagated since the nineteenth century to give us a quite unfair view of this vibrant and exciting period.


Tuesday, August 31, 2004

 
Another Cringe Alert

This is the lamest Bible translation I have come across so far. Compare:

After Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist, he saw ‘‘the Spirit descending upon him like a dove; and a voice came from heaven, ‘Thou art my beloved Son; with thee I am well pleased''' (Mark 1:10-11, Revised Standard Version).

Compare that with this new translation:

‘‘A pigeon flew down and perched on him. Jesus took this as a sign that God's Spirit was with him. A voice from overhead was heard saying, ‘That's my boy!'''




 
Cringe Alert

New York's planned parenthood wants JK Rowling to include sex ed
lessons at Hogwarts in her next book. "For the Harry Potter
readers, just think of the possibilities:Snapes, that sullen, nasty
professor lecturing on the facts of biology and sex..."
Excuse me, what?

Wasn't there enough of Harry furiously polishing his broom and
wand in the last book? If it isn't, I have one word for these
people. FANFICTION.

This pagehas some titles for the next book based on this...

Harry Potter And The Adulterer's Zone
Harry Potter And The Bedchamber Of Regrets
Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Abstinence
Harry Potter And The Object Of Desire!
Harry Potter and the Order of the Penis


 
PRESS RELEASE
Chiropractors for Consumers Union blamed the Salvation Army for pooh-poohing the effects of lactose intolerance among habitual adulterers.

"Their elitist attitude makes fools of us all," said the spokeshominid, adding that habitual adulterers plan to file a class-action lawsuit in federal court asking $1 quadrillion in damages.


Monday, August 30, 2004

 
Rather disturbing divorce story here,and also here. Sometimes attempts to
simplify a complex problem like divorce can create even worse situations.

 
Kid Radd is approaching the end.

Friday, August 27, 2004

Wednesday, August 18, 2004
 
Interesting article here about the wankspeak that reviewers and critics use, especially with regard to books.


Monday, August 16, 2004
 
I passed my driving test today!

Wednesday, August 11, 2004
 
Maybe for my birthday I should host a cuddle party.

Sunday, August 08, 2004
 
Check out these cool robots. Isn't it nice to be living in the future?

There's animatronic ones, entertainment ones, domestic ones, walking ones and humanoid face ones, but they don't seem to have many of what we've all been waiting for- sex robots!

 
Just got back from the TISM concert
It was really cool of course. They had 'TISM idol' and I think they took some girls out of the crowd, and would sing a line or two from a TISM song, then a panel of judges (non-tism member judges) would insult them, except one I think they would suck up to in a really rediculous way (curiously similar to the real Australian Idol).And I think they called them all Laetitia. This was interspersed between the songs. TISM came out with big signs on their heads, one had paul, another had george, and I think a third one called ringo, and the rest said John (apparently those are actually the names of members of this really obscure band that nobody has ever heard of). And they also did all their usual stylish dancing antics and went crowdsurfing, where they got a lot of their costumes torn off. I think at one point, one of them, either Ron or Humphrey probably, was only left with underwear intact (they kept them on this time, thank goodness). and of course they lost their masks a few times in the crowd, and I was close enough twice to see their faces, so I've seen what two of them look like now. What do they look like, you ask? Well, just some ugly old guys as you've probably suspected, in fact they look a lot better with the masks on really. Oh, and I managed to tear off a little of costume, so now I have a little piece of TISM. The first supporting act was okay, what with the dancing girls and the toy keyboards and salt and lemons and powertools and whatnot. The second one I didn't really like. The lead singer was this big huge fat guy
only wearing gladwrap, thankfully with some fake hair sort of stuff to cover his genitals, but still he was pretty gross, and I was glad at that point some people came and stood in front of me, hiding the grossness. They did a lot of their classic songs, they even did the country western version of defecate on my face. And I got to hear the new ones that I hadn't gotten around to listening yet. I Don't think I like them quite as much as I do the Derigour Mortis ones. Now I might have gotten some of these details wrong or mixed up a bit, as for a while I was kind of being bounced and tossed about a bit throughout the crowd of the Mosh pit until I managed to maneuver my way out, reminding me again of why I don't like mosh pits. I mean, you can only take being drowning in other people's smoke-flavoured sweat and being submerged in some strange guy's man-bosoms so many times. I did find some nice calm pockets, and managed to find a nice halfway point, where I could, you know, not be crushed to death. Some people did help me not be crushed to death, and I helped some other people not get crushed too, nice to know that not everybody is keen to trample all over you. And beforehand I visited Shawn's place for the first time, so I was doing the thing where I walk around the house looking at everything in a way like I'm visiting the museum or an art gallery or something. Didn't steal anything though.

Thursday, August 05, 2004
 
Dark Shadows of the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement

No no no no no! This silly Australia-US free trade Agreement thingy seems to have provisions for Australia to fall in line with America's continuously-extending copyright laws, and their DMCA (digital millenium copyright act). I've been suspicious of this free trade agreement but haven't really paid much attention to this issue. I think our laws are enough as it is (like, copyright is death of author + 50 years), I don't want us to follow us to follow America's path of copyright and intellectual property laws, or their silly ideas about how to deal with this bizarre new internet thingy (with regard to the safe harbour and DMCA bit). Here's some links about
America's troublesome copyright hi-jinks:

Sonny Bono Copyright Extension Act

Opposing Copyright Extension

More on Eldred vs Ashcroft

Free Culture

And here's the text of the free trade agreement

Tuesday, August 03, 2004
 
If this is real, then I think George Lucas has really gone off the deep end

Apparently, he's decided to change the ending a bit of Return of the Jedi so that that the guy originally
playing Anakin Skywalker is replaced with the guy who plays him in the lame prequels. I guess that will be
the digitally re-remastered extra-special edition. Does anyone else think that all this retroactive re-editing
is getting just a bit silly?

Friday, July 30, 2004
 
Speaking of those wacky, hollywood-esque Religions...
After that last post, I saw on my blog ads up the top one was
about that weirdo 'A Course in Miracles' thing that my cousin
who is a witch is into. Right next to it is an ad that says,
'What is heresy?' Funny when you get a randomly made
contrast like that.

 
Got my TISM ticket today!
I had this idea today of how I'd like to add some new notes to our currency system.
They'd be like the current ones except with five cents subtracted, so you'd have
your $4.95 note, $9.95, $19.95, $49.95 and $99.95 note. It'd sure make things
a bit easier when paying for some things. It might make it a bit more difficult
when adding things up, so I'd keep the normal ones as well. Actually, it'd
probably be a pretty silly thing to actually do, I just get a bit annoyed at
the way shops make sure they never have a nice round number, they always
subtract like 5 cents so they try to make you think it costs a lot less than what
it actually does. I don't know whether that actually works or not, I know
that I always automatically round it up. I suppose there's probably
some study out there comparing people buying nice round numbers versus
those with the 5 cents subtracted. Who knows.

Why is it that whenever you hear someone talk about their particular
line of work, the first thing they say is, 'well, you know, it's a lot of hard
work,' or 'hey, it might look easy but it's actually a lot of hard work.'
It's not like you ever find people going around bragging about how
easy their jobs are. 'pfft. Piece of cake. A monkey could do it. work?
well, if you want to call it that, heh heh.' No one ever says stuff like
that. What is with this automatic defensive line that these people
are taking anyway? Are they assuming that everyone thinks they're just
slacking off? There are a few exceptions to the rule though. Like, I
was watching Girl TV today because I'm a filthy pervert and one
of the girls was interviewing this model, asking questions like, 'I know it
looks easy but do you find it hard?' (or something along those lines)
and he (it was a male model) replied, 'Nah, it's a pretty easy job really.
Not really much you have to do. Someone does my makeup and hair, someone
else dresses me, and I go out and walk around a bit. Couldn't be easier.'
The other exception is Billy Connolly. Once I saw him on this talkshow
thingamajig and he remarked that he hated it when you see people
like actors going around saying, 'Oh, no, it's not all glamour you know, it's
terribly difficult, not many people would want to do it if they knew what
it was really like, oh, yes, it's such a trial!' (with violins
playing in the background). 'Get your hand off it' he says to those folks,
and he also said that he loves doing what he does and would rather do
it than anything else.

Finally, some honesty! I'm glad that at least
some people with wanky jobs finally realise that you'd have to be a moron
not to see that you'd rather be doing their jobs than cleaning up piles
of shit or telemarketing and that they should stop whinging, shut up
and be grateful for once. Honestly, those celebs sometimes. They spend
all that time fellating their way to the top of their field, only to
complain about the trials of life being the cream of the crop. What, Mr or Ms Celeb,
you're surprised that wealth and fame is just that, wealth and fame, and not
spiritually fulfilling? Well, surprise surprise, you finally learned what
everyone has been telling you since preschool. All those sunday school
teachers were right when they said that those things wouldn't make you
happy. It's just that most people prefer to have a bit of spare cash around
rather than struggling to make ends meet, and have daydreams about the glory
of fame to take their minds off being a mediocre nothing that nobody
cares about. If you wanted to fill that emptiness inside, how about
saying a prayer for once? Maybe visit one of those church thingies?
And no, please not one of your bullshit hollywood religions like Scientology
or Kabbalah. Why not one of those mainstream ones? Judaism, Chistianity,
Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism? If I haven't heard of it or it's got less than
fourteen million followers it's probably not worth bothering with. I mean,
if your god or spirit guide or whatever has only ever bothered to tell
the secrets of the universe to your guru's little class of 25 and no one else
he (or she) is probably not really worth bothering with. It also helps if it's
a tradition that goes back further than, say, a year. Of course, I'd prefer it
if everyone was in the same one as me, but I'd just be happy if more of those
hollywood types joined a religion that can at least get a paragraph mention
in a general knowledge encyclopedia.


Thursday, July 22, 2004
 
Close your eyes and it will soon be over
I'm going through one of my periodic jealousy fits at the moment.
It's not something I usually write about, well, not publically
write about. So look out, dear reader, because it might even be YOU
that I am jealous of. It kind of annoys me that I get jealous
over really stupid things. Like for example recently I've been
jealous over some pious people. Well, I don't really know whether
they actually are pious, I can't peak inside their heart and
examine their spiritual life. But they project this image, you know
(for all I know it could all be an illusion). Like there's these
couple of guys I know like that. One guy, see, he already has this
magazine catalogue thing going, he's got the looks, the style, the
washboard abs, plus he's got this whole spirituality
thing going for him, like with his worship leading and stuff, so of
course all the Christian chicks are throwing themselves at him. You
know that saying or whatever about a cute guy being a woman's handbag,
like an accessory to make her look good,well I think these Christian
chicks want him as an inspirational postcard. I can see him now, in the
postcard standing on a beach, no, sitting on a towel, there's the
glare of the sunlight reflecting off his polished abs,surrounded by
hot bikini babes, and they're like got open bibles and he's leading
a bible study, maybe a big flower or something in the foreground,
and somewhere in the middle of the sky is some inspirational message,
or a bible verse, or the worst, an inspirational bible verse.

Besides Calvin-Klein billboard guy there's this other guy, and it's
even worse because physically he isn't any better looking than me, no,
he gets by with this personality thing, which is even worse because
I've got no excuse. How am I supposed to reassure myself when he's
there throwing his personality about all over the place? I'm like,
"well, you know, we're not all born looking like...hey! What are you doing?"
What really annoys me about those guys is the way they can get
away with all that dirty-dancing type shit with complete strangers,
but, of course, if I try it the girl's all like, "get away, you creep!"
But of couse, this guy wouldn't actually do that because remember
the topic here is these spiritual people. What's worse about these
guys is that they're so gosh-darned nice and friendly, they're all
like, "Hi Rhys! How are you going?" and I'm like, AARRGGHHH!!!
Competitor for female attention! DESTROY! But I say, "Oh, hi! Fine.
How are you?"

And then there's these girls that I'm jealous of as well. Or just
plain angry. The way they just walk around projecting spirituality
and purity everywhere, and the way they make you feel bad when
you stand next to them because you were imagining them naked just before,
and even if you weren't you still feel bad cause they're like up there
with the angels and you're like this dirty little worm compared to them.
And they're all nice and friendly as well, and I'm all conflicted because
on the one hand I want to ask her out, and on the other I'm like, no, I
can't do that, she's outta my league, on too high of a level for me. Then
I just want to get out of there and take some deep breaths.

One really bad situation is when you're in a class, or in a discussion
group or something, and then the spiritual girl will say something,
and everyone will nod their heads knowingly, thinking it's all very
profound, and I'm thinking, 'man, that was just plain stupid!' but,
you know, I can't say anything, because when I do everyone turns and looks
at me and gives me the nasty look, or the spiritual girl starts crying
and runs out of the room.

I get jealous of the way everyone will listen to every little thing
that comes out of this girl's mouth as if it was sent there straight
from God. Okay, that might happen occaisionally, but not every single
time! And she's like seen as this wise sage and everyone will go to
her for advice about their relationships and personal problems and stuff.

No one ever asks me for advice about their relationships. Oh sure,
I give it out to people, whether they like it or not, but no one
actually comes to me for advice about their personal problems, unless
they say something like, 'hey, I got this really weird rash happening...'
and I say, 'eeew, gross. What are you asking me for? Go talk to your doctor.'
Oh, wait, there's an exception to that. If there's a girl that I've been
rejected by, that will be the person who comes to me for advice, or the boyfriend.
And of course I say things like, 'yeah, I really think you guys should
spend more time apart from each other. At least a year or two. In fact,
I think it'd be best for both of you if you broke up altogether, you're
just not suited to each other.' or, 'okay, why don't you pretend to go
out with me for a while and that will make him jealous and want you back.
So we'll stand here in his line of sight and pash for ten minutes or so.
I'll probably have to grope your boobies a bit too to make it more
believable.'

And what happens? They follow my wonderful advice and end up getting
married. AARRRGGGHHH!!!!

So yeah, I get this weird jealousy thing happening, then I get all angry
with myself because it's so stupid. I'm like, hey, so I want to become
like this more spiritual person. WELL BEING INSANELY JEALOUS AND INFURIATED
BY THEM IS PROBABLY A STEP IN THE WRONG DIRECTION.

Oh, wait, I can't forget my best jealousy story ever, when I was on this
kid's camp, and there was this other guy called Rhys. And one day some kid
was calling out my name, so I turn, and he says, 'Oh no, not you. I meant
the cool Rhys.' GGGRRRRR!!!! I can't have someone being better at being
me than I am! Ooooh how I hate that other Rhys! AAARRRGGGHHHH!!!!!

Wednesday, July 21, 2004
 
Chuck Palahniuk is giving writing lessons
Looks like he's going to use the tutorials he has temporarily
on his site as material for putting together a book on writing.
Probably be more useful than a lot of other books on writing
I've seen. There's a lot of writers seem to get by on having a
good concept or something while having rather mediocre writing
skills (the Da Vinci Code, anyone?) whereas Chuck Palahniuk
writes very effectively. What I'd like to see, though, is for
someone to use the kind of techniques his uses to
write a very different book, a different genre with a whole
different tone, I don't just want to see a whole crop of Fight
Club
clones. It's true that there's no really original story,
but you can easily tell when a writer is influenced by just
one particular author. They become like a sidekick to them,
this miniture inferior copy that really wishes they were that
guy. Like the Wraith, tee hee hee.
I prefer the approach where you draw from a variety
of styles and genres, and picking up various techniques
from different schools of ideas. I tend to be rather
ecletic in everything, really. Wait, does ecletic have one or
two c's? Ecletic. Eccletic. Maybe I'll give it three or four just
to be safe. Eccccletic. Oh, wait, spell checkers are good for
this sort of thing, aren't they? Let's see, ah, turns out it
does have a second c, but not where I was putting it.
Eclectic.


Tuesday, July 20, 2004
 
My family are watching Australian Idol in the next room
That show is one of the biggest loads of wank ever.


Saturday, July 17, 2004
 
Was L Frank Baum a Communist?

Except from The Emerald City of Oz:

No disease of any sort was ever known among the Ozites, and so no one
ever died unless he met with an accident that prevented him from
living. This happened very seldom, indeed. There were no poor people
in the Land of Oz, because there was no such thing as money, and all
property of every sort belonged to the Ruler. The people were her
children, and she cared for them. Each person was given freely by his
neighbors whatever he required for his use, which is as much as any one
may reasonably desire. Some tilled the lands and raised great crops
of grain, which was divided equally among the entire population, so
that all had enough. There were many tailors and dressmakers and
shoemakers and the like, who made things that any who desired them
might wear. Likewise there were jewelers who made ornaments for the
person, which pleased and beautified the people, and these ornaments
also were free to those who asked for them. Each man and woman, no
matter what he or she produced for the good of the community, was
supplied by the neighbors with food and clothing and a house and
furniture and ornaments and games. If by chance the supply ever ran
short, more was taken from the great storehouses of the Ruler, which
were afterward filled up again when there was more of any article than
the people needed.

Every one worked half the time and played half the time, and the
people enjoyed the work as much as they did the play, because it is
good to be occupied and to have something to do. There were no cruel
overseers set to watch them, and no one to rebuke them or to find
fault with them. So each one was proud to do all he could for his
friends and neighbors, and was glad when they would accept the things
he produced.

Thursday, July 15, 2004
 
Mark Shea is coming to Australia!
Don't know whereabouts though yet, might only be Sydney or Melbourne or something.
have to wait for more details.

Wednesday, July 14, 2004
 
Gosh, It's a bit of a wasteland, isn't it?
I keep forgetting to update this here weblog. I come up with these
cool things to write about, and even write them sometimes,
but I never get around to posting them. Then, when I do
log in, I just feel blaaaaah and don't want to bother even posting
those things I've already written. Also been forgetting to update
the keenspace account as well. Same thing happens with that.
I've been trying to get into the habit of putting up a comic
every couple of days, but that just hasn't been happening.
I really need somebody to tell me to do these things. Or maybe
I'll set particular times for doing these things. It's not like I'm too
busy or anything. I'm thinking maybe I need to start a friendly
debate with someone, I seem to be most productive when I'm
writing in response to something else. Where are those Calvinists
when you need them? Oh, wait, I said friendly debate.
Haven't been checking on Smurflist for quite a while. Taking a
holiday from it, I guess. After a while it just seems like it's always
going in circles. Been more checking up on other people's blogs,
dropping a comment here or there. I'm tending to like following
different blogs now rather than email discussion lists or web forums.
I check up on Patrick's fora every now and then, it might be kind of
slower with less posts and less frequent posting, but it's higher quality,
what with very strong anti-moron rules.

Bec's got me hooked on the Oz books now, since she mentioned it at
Patrick's birthday thing. I've been ordering all the ones
they have in the library, and reading on the internet those they don't. At this
famous forty website they have the texts up to Ruth Plumly Thompson's
first one, The Royal Book of Oz. I don't really like reading stuff on
the net, I prefer a book in my hands, but I just can't resist these
Oz-urges. So the Oz books are joining GK Chesterton, whose
writings I also cannot resist and I read off the net because
I can't buy them anywhere. I've been meaning to read more fiction
lately anyway, since even after finishing uni I've still been reading
mostly essays and some scholarly type stuff. I want to get a kind of
balance between reading that and reading fiction, I guess like
balancing out the sides of your brain or something. Been meaning to
write more fiction too, seeing as I've been mainly writing essay and
journal type stuff, besides doing some comics. Did an interesting little
thingy earlier today, I might type that up and post it here eventually.
I gotta see that Return to Oz movie at some point. I haven't seen it since
I was a kid, and I think it was this film that gave me these freaky images
that haunted my dreams for ages. I've been trying to work that out for ages.
"Now, which movie was it that had the such and such?" I'd say to myself.
I looked at a few other movies but they weren't the ones. Then when I
started reading about Return to Oz, I went, AHA! YES! THAT'S IT! THAT'S
THE ONE! Can't get it in any of the videostores I go to. I'll buy it if I have to.
Then I will have finally resolved my childhood dream issues!






Sunday, May 23, 2004
 
Rhys desires to cruise da 'hood.
Well I finally got around to booking another driving test, so please send out heaps of prayers for me. If you're Catholic like me, you can ask Elijah, St Frances of Rome or Bl. Sebastian of Aparicio to pray for me too, seeing as they are all patron saints of drivers (among other things, see the Patron Saints Index). If you're a Raelian or Scientologist or something, put on your tin foil helmet and send a message up to the mothership for me. Pagans, Wiccans and new age folk can put in the good word for me with the greater powers. Atheists/Agnostics etc, well, you can't really do much I suppose. Unless you want to send me a monetary donation or something.

Monday, May 10, 2004
 
Hoorah! A decent webcomic!

Mine, that is.

I decided to use my keenspace account at http://rhystuck.keenspace.com/
I had previously scanned and saved on cd about 60 pages of this ongoing epic storyline thing, and it updates daily at the moment. Until it catches up to where I am in the story now, then I guess it will probably update once a week, fortnight, month, millenium etc. At some point I suppose I might fix up the look of the website a bit, at the moment it's just the default templates. At some point the looks of all the characters will suddenly change, as I finally decided what this alien species should actually look like (hooray for six-breasted alien princesses!). Before that I just used a human look by default. I think I might just leave this unexplained in the storyline, like the way some TV shows change the actors of main characters and expect nobody to notice, or like the mysterious case of that period of Star Trek history of the original series where the klingons lack bumpy foreheads.

Saturday, February 28, 2004
 
shoujo

This is something I wrote that is too long for the comment boxes:

Sometimes guys will seek out to be friends with girls first and then get romantic, but then it seems like some females think that unless you try to shag them within the next 24 hours, you can only ever be friends and never have anything romantic with them, so then guys like Bill will react to that, and might try to date a girl as soon as they meet in order to get in there in a chance for romance. Me, I think I'd rather just not bother with girls that do funny things like that and try to play mind-games with you and instead try to ferret out the ones that think like Shawn does that 'friends - then maybe romance later' is a better way to go. As for being overtaken, I think that is just the normal human background level of inadequacy and feeling that lots of people are probably doing way better than you are, rather than anyone in particular, unless there are specific people that Bill is thinking of. I know I'm not in any better position than Bill, I've got no job, no car, no woman, live at home with my parents, won't be able to afford to move out or get a car anytime soon, will end up with a big uni debt, and the world has not yet recognised my genius, not to mention the chances that I might go insane, with all the hereditary mental illnesses in my family. And all of you guys aren't really all that much better off, you seem to be also doing either the poor uni student thing, or are stuck trying to make your way with a pretty ordinary low-paying job. So whoever these people are that Bill is jealous of, I'm pretty sure we aren't any of them, so I guess whoever they are, they are probably sucky people I don't know anyway.

Friday, February 13, 2004
 
NO MORE WHEAT, RYE OR BARLEY FOR ME!
I discovered the other week that I have Celiac, so on Leader’s Weekend I joined the elitist little clique of those fancy-pants special meals people. It wasn’t really all that different, seeing as there was so many different foods, all those different salads and stuff. It was just every now and then I had something different like a piece of chicken instead of the meaty pasty thingies and stuff. In the past whenever I heard about people having special meals I kept thinking of those weird foods they have on the original series of Star Trek, like differently coloureds cubes and ambiguous looking goop and that sort of thing. Space food.

It’s kind of tricky this Celiac thing because even though something might not have wheat in its list of ingredients, sometimes wheat is used in some of the thingies like different kinds of starch and I think even that mysterious ‘vegetable gum’ stuff. So it’s easier for me to just not eat those processed foods and stick to the ‘gluten free’ ones. You’d think the companies would be more careful about that sort of thing with all the litigation going around. Like you see ‘may contain traces of peanuts’ on foods. Maybe that’s because those peanut allergy people seem to have pretty drastic reactions, like collapsing into unconsciousness and needing to be taken to hospital, it tends to have more of a reaction on those current affairs shows. “How could they let this happen?” the teary mother cries. Whereas for me, having wheat is more like smoking. You won’t drop dead tomorrow, but if you keep having it, it will cause a lot of huge problems later on and can kill you eventually. At the moment effects of it aren’t that obvious.

Maybe on the next camp I do I should do some reviews of all the special meals I have.

I think I might have been a bit sick while on this camp just passed. I didn’t realise beforehand, seeing as I was at home in my room, but being surrounded by all these healthy people made me think, “hey, I think I might not be feeling all that well.” That was on the last day anyway when I realised that so it didn’t really make much difference.

I’ve had one of these telemarketing people ring up when I’m the only one home, and they ask if they should call again later or call tomorrow. I tell them to call tomorrow, and as they keep calling back at the same time, this has been going on for like a week. I wonder how long this can keep going. Maybe forever.


Saturday, January 17, 2004
 
Coleridge
You are Samuel Taylor Coleridge, writer of
unmitigated wierdness, abandoner of wife, and
stoned for most of your life!


What Romantic poet are you?(except Keats)
brought to you by Quizilla


 

Sim World looking a lot like real world


It's about the Sims Online. Here's a quote from the article:


Alphaville, the game's fictional city, could have gone in any number of directions, depending on the arbitrary decisions of the online game players who make up its people through their chosen "avatars", or game characters.

Alphaville could have become a socialist utopia, a grand experiment in free-market capitalism or simply a reflection of the allure and the pitfalls of any real Western city.

As it was, Alphaville quickly turned into a hellhole of scam-artists, crime syndicates, mafia extortion artists and teenage girls turning tricks to make ends meet. It became a breeding ground for the very worst in human nature - a benign-sounding granny, for example, who specialised in taking new players into her confidence, then showered them in abuse. Then there was the scam-artist known as Evangeline, who started out equally friendly and then stole new players' money.


Friday, December 19, 2003
 
No longer a Protestant, not yet a Catholic
Well, I guess it's time to come out of the closet. After a lot of reading about, writing about, thinking about and praying about a whole heap of theological, philosophical, exegetical/hermeneutical and other issues, I have decided to join the Catholic Church. I hesitate to use the word 'convert' seeing as I don't consider myself to be changing to a different religion, rather, as I am already a Christian, I am simply embracing a 'larger' form of Christianity.

I seem to have gone through Chesterton's 'three stages of conversion:'


The first phase is that of the young philosopher who feels
that he ought to be fair to the Church of Rome. He wishes to do
it justice; but chiefly because he sees that it suffers injustice...I had no more idea of becoming a Catholic than of becoming a cannibal.

The second stage is that in which the convert begins to be
conscious not only of the falsehood but the truth and is enormously
excited to find that there is far more of it than he would ever
have expected.

And the third stage is perhaps the truest and the most terrible.
It is that in which the man is trying not to be converted.


I started off merely defending Catholics from the rather ridiculous accusations made against them by Protestants. I always thought it rather unusual (as Chesterton also noticed) that the people who criticised them the most didn't even seem to know what the Catholic Church actually taught. You would think that the first thing people would do if they were trying to offer a reasoned critique would be to know what exactly it was they were criticising. So I did defend the Catholic Church, but the idea of actually becoming one was the furtherest thing from my mind.

Then, I began to investigate more and more of what the Catholic Church actually taught, and found a lot of things that make sense and I could agree with, and even things I didn't really like, (such as those tricky Marian doctrines), I could at least understand where they were coming from and the reasoned basis for them, and there were other things that I could accept because I did not really care much eitther way (for example, I don't really care whether a church has guitars and drums and modern music, or just does things the traditional way, although on second thought I think I prefer the more traditional ways of doing things). I kind of reached the point where I could agree on an intellectual basis on the bits I didn't like, so I couldn't really find any good reason for remaining outside the Church.

And then, of course, was the third stage, when I had the feeling like perhaps I'd been duped, lured into a snare by Romish charms, quite an emotional resistance, and I looked for reasons why I could be wrong about the whole thing, but couldn't really raise any real objections. So, I've been convinced that the Catholic Church is the 'most true' form of Christianity. So now I'll be going into the conversion process for joining up (there's a period of time of having catechumal classes, then there's a first confession, confirmation and first communion, I've already been validly baptised by the Church's standards so I won't need to be baptized again).

Larissa wants to join up as well. I suppose dad will be pleased, seeing as he is a Catholic, although mum might get a bit upset for a while, as she is a Pentecostal and all us kids were brought up as Pentecostals. It's a bit strange, all my life I've heard the testimonies of people who say they were brought up in a lifeless, antichrist Roman Catholic Church, and discovered the joy of the presence of God in Charismatic churches, yet in my experience it is the other way around.

Sunday, December 14, 2003
 
This morning I woke up with these thoughts in my head: St. Nicolas was a Catholic Bishop. So what's all this "mrs Claus" business then? and: That John Rhys-Davies who plays Gimli on the LOTR movies. What's all this sudden "comic relief dwarf" business in the two towers? I think that movie also needed more ents. If there's one thing I know for sure, you can never have too many ents. If I was directing those movies, I'd have ents coming out of my ears, so it's probably for the best that I didn't. THEY'RE LIKE TREES BUT THEY CAN WALK AROUND AND DO THINGS! How could you not love them?

Wednesday, December 10, 2003
 
Hooray!!!
I got my results back today, I got distinctions for all my subjects. I was a bit worried about one of them, the exam for it was rediculously hard and I wasn't sure if I'd passed, but it turns out I did well. So that's it, really, I've finished my BA degree, so I guess now I'm qualified to be an elitist snob.

Tuesday, December 09, 2003
 
Schpoodle!
I've just about finished pencilling in Schpoodle, the comic I'm doing with Patrick. We wrote a script for it together, and we're both doing a version of it, and when we have both finished we can compare them and see what each of us has done with it. I'll leave it aside for a little while before inking it in, seeing as you never quite pick up all the mistakes the first couple of times you look it over. I've tried doing comic books several different ways, and I think the best way is to pencil in all the pages first and then ink them all in (if you're doing a comic book all by yourself, that is). It's a lot easier seeing as I make quite a lot of changes, so then the inking in becomes the 'point of no return'. I used to try to completely finish each page before going onto the next one, and that was a lot harder for me, it just didn't suit my style of working. It's 17 pages long. This keyboard is annoying me a bit, the space bar fell off, and when I put it back in I couldn't get the wire thingy in properly, so I left it out, and although the space bar still works, sometimes every now and then the right side of it gets stuck down, and I have to hit it again more in the middle or to the left to make it pop up again.

Sunday, November 02, 2003
 
Where did it go?
Here I was, typing away and I accidentally hit a key or something and the whole page of text I was writing disappears. It didn't vanish while trying to send it, which is what usually happens, no, I was just typing away and before you know it it's all gone. I must have accidentally hit some key combination for "delete everything irrepairably" or something.

Friday, October 24, 2003
 
I hope I don't get LEFT BEHIND for writing this

Ah...premillenial dispensationalism. There's a lot I could say about that, like its extremely dodgy biblical and theological basis, and the fact that if you've been in evangelical/pentecostal circles for a while now, you notice that the prophecies and interpretations made over time tend to change, the old ones quietly discarded (when it becomes clear that they probably won't happen, like communism taking over the world etc) and new ones proposed, often based on the same scripture proof texts, and soon after a world changing events occur, like the fall of the berlin wall or september 11, end times writers get busy showing how obviously the literal interpretation of scripture had in fact predicted these events (none seem to be bothered by the fact that they don't seem to manage to make the predictions before the events occur). In fact i might do some sort of research project, comparing all the old predictions to the new ones.

I remember them saying things like the USSR going to invade Israel, along with China, Russia being the big bear from the east or something. Nowdays, I hear of predictions of where the Muslim terrorists will next hit. It seems to me, rather than a scholarly analysis of what predictions the bible might have, it's more like using the bible to support whatever political agenda is on the table at the moment. These days I have to remember to check for Muslim terrorists under my bed instead of communist spies.

They do make some predictions that could be said to be coming true, that of general trends like the lowering of moral standards or privitisation or globalisation, predictions that Joe schmuck from down the street could make.

Going back to some of the old books, like Barry Smith and others (Barry Smith died recently, just last year or the year before or something) I noticed a few suspicious things, like the date-setting for the return of Jesus, which we are specifically forbidden to do, no one knowing the time and the hour, coming like a theif in the night (I suppose you could say, 'hey, that just says the time and hour of the day. Doesn't mean I can't pick the year! But that would be silly). There's also this tendency to not give any details on his information or where it came from and stuff, to protect those innocent anonymous sources, but Mr Smith assures us that he has the information in his files at home, so I guess I have to trust him. Where he does cite sources, it's often rather obscure things like secret masonic handbooks or documents written by Jesuits centuries ago, the sort of stuff you're not going to casually pick up off the shelf at your local library. In fact, I get the suspicion that for a lot of things in his books, he just plain made it up.

And the kind of theology behind a lot of these books is just plain strange, when you think about it. First there's this tribulation thing, but that's okay, because we get raptured before that. Seems a little too modern, american and comfortable to me. What about all those Christians in the first couple centuries AD, facing all kinds of persecution? Being fed to lions and being used as a human candle sounds a lot more like a tribulation to me, and seems to me more like what the bible refers to than our modern ideas. And what about all those Christians being persecuted throughout the world today? Of course, they're not really being persecuted, nobody's forcing to put a barcode on their forehead.

Mark Shea keenly observes:

For we modern Americans are not slaves groaning under the lash or persecuted Christians faced with the colossus of hostile Roman culture. Rather we are comfortable people with cell-phones and hot running water who dread the loss of American creature comforts. And so modern Last Days scenarios tend to portray an End of the World in which the surest sign of the Trump of Doom is an infringement on American Buying Power. Hence, many fundamentalists warn of the "Mark of the Beast" as a barcode on marketable goods or postulate as the ultimate evil some Vast International Economic Conspiracy aimed at harming American economic and political sovereignty.

http://www.mark-shea.com/apoc.html

And then, after this tribulation thing, Jesus comes back. But not for a final judgement, no, he comes to set up a thousand-year kingdom on earth, ruling with an iron fist, or a 'rod of iron'. A kind of totalitarian dictator. And that's fine for a while, until some evil people like the devil get loose at the end of the thousand years, so then Jesus deals with that and everything, sending them to hell and his saved to heaven. Seems a bit like a funny thing to do. If he's ruling, on a kingdom on earth, why put off the judgement? And what's going on for this thousand years anyway? It all seems a bit rediculous and pointless. It sounds, in fact, a lot like the same kind of expectations the disciples had about a future earthly kingdom, Israel conquering Rome, them at the right hand of Jesus.

So my view over the years has changed from the premillenial dispensationalism I heard about when i was 12-15 and is now a view called, 'Amillenial preterism.' The amillenial meaning that i don't think their will be a literal 1000-year reign on earth, rather, than the millenial kingdom is Jesus's reign both in heaven and on earth in the hearts of His people, from his ascension until his second coming. The 'preterism' part means that i think that a lot of the predictions made were in fact already fulfilled in the first century, like the destruction of the temple in 70 AD etc. The only things left to happen is for Jesus to come back, and have a big final judgement thing. Prophecies could also be fulfilled in the end times, like in the left behind books, but that would be a 'double fulfilment.' It wouldn't need to happen, but it's not going to cause me too much trouble if it does. You can find out more about preterism on JP Holding's website, here: http://tektonics.org/eschatology.html



Thursday, September 25, 2003
 
The Katt's Lair

Well it's one of those times when I don't really feel like doing anythidng in particular so I'm bumming around on the Internet. I'd thought I'd have a look at fellow cartoonist/comic/manga creator type person (whatever she prefers to call herself, she can insert here, some people are happy with a general title like 'cartoonist' like me, other people get a bit uptight about that, preferring a specific title like manga author/artist or whatever. I can never be sure what a particular person prefers, so I put this note here. Myself, seeing as i haven't been very productive lately, have adopted the new title, 'professional slob.' By the way, this 'blog this page' button on the google toolbar is something I think I will get to like very much, because so often you see something on the internet and I think, 'I should write a blog entry about that,' but then I forget to get around to doing that. If I have a book that I own or a photocopy, I might write something in the margin or something, but more often on a separate piece of notepaper. I don't understand all these people who write in the margins and underline sentences in LIBRARY books. I mean, that's just stupid. How are you going to remember it later when you return the book? You'll have to write it down somewhere else anyway. And seeing as it's NOT YOUR BOOK, it's VANDALISM. Okay, okay, enough about that. Let's see, oh, I'm still in a bracket, I'll have to close that) Kinoko's manga thingy on the Interweb and there's a handy like to it just up above there.

Now there's a note here about her use of manga distinctives, such as having to read it from right to left and using Japanese language for some sound effects. She was kind enough to have the dialog in English, which I think was very nice and generous of her. Having everything right to left, I think, is one of those things that kind of loses its effect on a computer screen. I mean, if you have the book, you see 'aah, everything goes this way', but on the computer it gets a bit strange if you have to scroll over one side first and then scroll back to the other. But I think It's really just one of those things that can't be helped.

Okay, so I'm looking at the comic now. It's one of those ones where the Artwork is so good it makes my best ones look really crummy by comparison, so It's kind of embarassing for me. It's more a matter of the final, polished look, that is, rather than the quality of the art itself. It looks like how a comic is supposed to look. With me, I kind of just vomit onto the page. If it kinda makes sense, and everything looks something like how it's supposed to look, it's good enough, because just getting anything done at all is a big enough struggle for me. There's also the unity of the look. I haven't read through the whole thing, but I suspect it look unified, that things will generally stay looking like the same kind of thing. In my comics I'm lucky if the characters look the same from one page to the next, not to mention everything else, like the setting.

Hmm, this man doesn't seem to have any nipples, which is another of those manga distinctives.

I'm up to about p. 7-8 now. These girls are moving into this guy's house, and he doesn't know why. I'm going to see If I can guess the plot. This guy declared he would start a brothel in his own home when he was blind drunk, and these 'working girls' are responding to the ads he put in the newspaper. I'm probably wrong though.

Oh, they're relatives. Perhaps there'll be an incest storyline? I'm probably wrong about that too.

Aha, adopted daughters, so it can't really be an incest storyline.

Although, Judging by other manga comics you can find on the Internet, or fanfiction, having an incest storyline or a high school pimp would be rather ho-hum, and perverts would be yawning and getting bored. So I'm glad this comic probably won't be going into any of that stuff.

p.13-14 This page features a very interesting clock.

p. 19-20 Tee hee, see here for what I mentioned about the importance of the girls being adopted relatives.

p. 23-24 I just thought I'd mention here that I wish I had 3 beautiful girls to clean up my house.

p. 33-34 Tee hee hee.

Gosh look at the time, I think I might go to bed now.







Sunday, September 14, 2003
 
Sooo...what's the difference?

After a few different events, I recently realised something that I find terribly amusing. There are certain people who will start to look nervous if someone (of Catholic or Eastern Orthodox persuasion) cross themselves, or kneel to pray, they will cringe at the sight of rosaries or icons, get nauseous the minute they hear recitations of form prayers or the mention of the words 'veneration', 'rite', 'ritual' or 'sacrament', and generally crusade against what you might call the traditional forms of devotions or mysticism. And with the same breath, they will then turn around and starting speaking in tongues, involving a lot of shouting, sometimes shaking and repetitive prayers, and fall down and start wriggling around on the floor. I can understand the kind of Christian, perhaps of a staunch Reformed persuasion, who equally rejects all of these expressions of Christian spirituality. What I cannot understand is the Charismatic Christian, with this curious kind of short-sightedness, as if they have blinders on, that they cannot even see what a double-standard this must appear to be to anyone outside their particular group. It reminds of CS Lewis's approach of 'Mere Christianity', where he says that Christians should appear as a 'unified front' to those outside, and focus on what we have in common and not our differences. I think that is particularly important in issues like this, because to the outsider it can only appear to be rather silly. The response of someone outside would be, 'er, so, uh, what's the difference here?'

Saturday, September 06, 2003
 
Grr!
I just wrote a really good post and blogger lost at all! I shouldn't have deviated from my usual practice of writing them out and saving them beforehand. Aargh!

Tuesday, September 02, 2003
 
I just remembered...
I might as well add while on the topic of Gnosticism, that Neon Genesis Evangelion, one of my favorite anime series's, seems to draw heavily on Gnosticism, as well as Kabbalah, a form of Jewish mysticism.

Monday, September 01, 2003
 
Restorationism

One of my numerous email accounts is subscribed to a couple of self-help 'pop psychology' email lists. The kind of things you get from them are very often quite amusing, sometimes veering into all sorts of things like scientology or detecting energy fields through crystals and all sorts of new-agey type stuff. I haven't seen any detailing the health benefits of drinking your own urine yet though (apparently there was someone with a stall for that at a psychic fair type thing).

Recently I recieved an email with some new 'finding your inner consciousness' or whatever type thing, and I noticed that it was in fact Gnosticism. Gnosticism, by the way was a heresy that existed mostly in the 2nd - 4th centuries that was combatted by the early church (actually, it was more like several heresies, although often with similar traits). The writer of the article mentioned something like 'this is the true meaning of the Genesis story in hebrew that had been mistranslated by Christians.' Which is really a quite silly thing to claim. Anyone can check out the Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek versions that the translations of the bible come from if they really want to. There's no secrets that magically appear when you look at the hebrew rather than the english version. Sure, there's always some debate on the different ways that things are translated, but any look at the different english translations will show you that the differences aren't as great as they are commonly made out to be.

It is more a question of interpretation than translation, and there is of course much debate on how different things should be interpreted, based on the differences in the original languages rather than the english languages, meanings of words and grammar issues, as well as all sorts of debates about the context and 'how those at the time would have read it' and so on. Yet even though there are different ways of interpreting parts of the bible, some, I think, can be automatically ruled out due to their sheer rediculousness. The Gnostic view seems to fit into this category, as it states the exact opposite of the actual genesis account. Just so you know what I'm talking about I'll just do a quck comparison between the Biblical and Gnostic accounts.

If you remember from sunday school (and if you didn't go to sunday school, I'm sure you heard it anyway), God makes universe. In this universe is a planet called earth, on it somewhere is a place called the garden of Eden, and it has the first human pair in it. God says: 'Okay, you guys, I'm giving you this planet. Just, whatever you do, don't eat the fruit on this here tree.' They reply, 'okie-dokie, you're the boss.' A little while later, Eve's walking around, Satan in the form of a snake says, 'hey, that fruit's not so bad.' Eve says, 'duh, okay, gimme one!' Adam isn't much brighter, because then he says, 'hey, that looks tasty, gimme one.' They get kicked out of the Garden.

Now, the Gnostic view says, 'well, actually, the being that created the universe and everything in it wasn't the real God, that was a lesser being called the Demiurge. He created evil matter, that traps poor little souls. The higher God is a good spirit being. All people's souls are actually the divine spark, that comes from this higher God. Now, the snake in the garden wasn't the devil, it was a being sent from this higher God, who wanted to rescue the souls of adam of eve. So that is why the snake wanted them to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, because that is the wisdom that will rescue their souls. But the evil demiurge didn't want them to have this secret wisdom. The demiurge then went on to create the evil Hebrew religion, with laws to keep people entrapped in his evil, material universe. Jesus was another being sent from the higher God to give the same secret wisdom, like the snake. And because Jesus was pure spirit, he didn't really have a physical, material body, he was more like a hologram.'

The gnostic view also says that God didn't make Eve out of Adam's rib, actually it was the higher consciousness and wisdom of Adam emerging out of him, represented as Eve.

You can easily see that these Gnostic ideas are like the exact polar opposite of what Christians teach, so it's easy to see why they were so heavily opposed. Of course that doesn't mean I approve of the way heresy has been opposed in the past, although some people do just make you want to burn them at the stake.

Now in terms of these modern Gnosticism, This is a example of restorationism, or primitivism, the idea that the original Christianity, or some issue etc within it, has disappeared or been corrupted, except of course for the particular person who somehow found out about this missing thing, and we now have to get it back or go back to the way things were (so we had to wait over a thousand years for the higher God to get someone to tell us what we forgot about). It never seems to occur to them that maybe it was a good idea to get rid of the Gnostic ideas. Often they do not even approach the question of the truth or falsity of various ideas, being so obsessed with just the idea of fair play. Letting everyone have their own say is fair enough, but when ideas are mutually contradictory they can't all be right. One must be right, and the others wrong. Or they could be all wrong, and something else right they hadn't considered.

Gnosticism cannot be true simply because it was suppressed. After all, the idea of absolute monarchy has been suppressed in the past, yet not many people are saying that are governments are corrupt because they have suppressed absolute monarchy and embraced democracy (they say governments are corrupt for different reasons).

This seems to be a common trait in a lot of new-agey people. They seem to think that the church is oppressing them or their spirituality, which seems a bit rediculous today. I mean, fair enough if you lived back in the days of witch burnings, or if you live in an Islamic country, but where's all the oppression in our modern, western societies? All you need to do is switch on TV to see that the church isn't really controlling society. Although I suppose they might feel they are alienated from their friends and family. Or maybe they've just gotten paranoid from smoking too much pot.

This restorationist idea is common in Christian circles too. People write books on things like, 'hey it looks like the Early Church did this. Nobody does that anymore. The church must be corrupt. Let's do this thing we've forgotten about.' I've done this myself in the past, and it's an easy thing to do. But just because something was a common practice at one time, doesn't necessarily mean it's appropriate for every situation. For example, I've read a bit about how baptism may have happened in the Early Church, and it says it's likely people were baptised naked. Does anyone want to start doing that again? That's one way to get people to attend your church, at least as long as you have some fairly attractive converts.






Friday, August 22, 2003
 
Bleeeaaaaahhhhhhh.

Is exactly how I've been feeling lately.

Saturday, May 17, 2003
 

The Latest Jerry Springer Show



Jerry: Hi and welcome to the show. Today our theme is, "I want my party back."
Our first guest is Mr Simon Crean. Simon, what's your story with Kim Beazley?


Simon: Well, Jerry, a while ago my best friend was head of the
Australian Labour Party, but then their relationship was over, so he left
the party to me, so I've been leader of the opposition ever since.


Audience: Booooooooooooo!!!


Simon: Aw, shuddup. You don't know what ya'll talkin' 'bout. Shut Up!


Jerry: Simon, we have a little video for you, from your best friend, Kim Beazley.


[video plays]


Kim: Hi Jerry. Hi Simon. I've got a little secret for you. I know that
Simon ain't treatin' the ALP well, so I'm comin' back. I'm takin' the
ALP back. My baby's comin' home with me tonight.


Audience: Booooooooooooooo!!!


Simon: That dirty [bleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep]!!!


Jerry:Okay, shall we meet him? let's bring him out.


[Kim comes on stage, Simon runs out to attack him,
the bodyguards hold him back]


Simon: You filthy slut! You had your turn!


Kim: Hey man, you don't know how to treat them right.
I gotta take them back.


Simon: You left man! You left! You can't come back!!


Kim: I sure do, I gotta clean up the mess you made!!!


Audience: ooooh!


Simon: How could you do this to me, man! After
all I've done for you! You were my best friend!


Kim: You don't know how to take care of their needs!


Simon: Slut! Slut! Slut!


Kim: I ain't no slut! I just gotta do what I gotta do,
know what I mean, Jerry?


Audience: Dirty ho! Dirty ho! Dirty ho!


Kim: Hey, at least I ain't so lame that I need viagra
just for the voters to notice me! Honestly, Jerry, have
you seen his popularity ratings? He's electorally impotent!


Simon: Hey, at least I ain't no huge lardball! Get a load
that ass! It's huge! Honestly, who'd choose that, over this?
[Simon strips to his underwear, and parades up and
down like a fashion model]


Audience: Put it back on! Put it back on!


Jerry: Okay, It's audience Question time.


Black Woman: Sistah, you gotta know what it's at,
you know what I'm sayin'? Giiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiirrrrrrrrrrllllffffffffrrrrr
rriiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaannndddd!!!


Everyone: Huh? What?


Homeless-looking man: This is a question for Kim -
how you gonna fit the ALP in wit' you in your trailer?
Or is it extra-Jumbo size? [half a dozen more people
make fat jokes about Kim Beazley]


Man: Hi, ma name's Kevin Rudd. I just wanna say this
ALP is too good for both of ya! She's a-comin' home with me tonight!


Simon: Why you...[chases him throughout the studio]


Jerry's final thought: There comes a time in our lives when
we know we've grown out of a relationship, but we don't live
in a vacuum, once we leave a political party our position is
inevitably filled with someone else. They may not live to our
expectations,may even be incompetent and need replacing,
but to come back again, like a dad who's all too eager to
'help' his son out with his homework by doing it all for him,
shows you have emotional immaturity and insecurity and
have difficulty letting go. So who should lead the labour party?
Me, I don't care, I vote Liberal.


Thursday, May 15, 2003
 

What's with all these good looking people?


I'm always surprised, not just at all the good-looking people I find that exist in the world, but also the fact that it seems like more are born every day. Where do they keep coming from? You'd think that the supply of pretty faces would be exhausted by now. I mean, there's certain things you have to get right, like the right amount of eyes and noses, and I mean, there's only so many variations you can do on the same theme, and there's so many more things that can go wrong then right. So why are there so many beautiful people? They should have run out by now.

"Sorry," comes the announcement. "We've run out of all the good genes. The rest of you are scewed."

"Awww..." comes the cry of all the pre-incarnate soul that haven't been born yet. "Why do we always get stuck with the leftovers?"

But no, and there's so many people who are at least moderately attractive, and so few grotesquely and hideously ugly. I thought we'd be up to our knees in ugly bastards by now. Where are the freakish mutants? With all the greenie hippies moaning about pollution in the environment, you'd expect quite a few. Or maybe there is just something wrong with my idea of how the world works.


Sunday, May 11, 2003
 

Not feeling too well


I haven't been feeling too well recently. I've been tired a lot, doing a lot of sleeping, had a woozy feeling head sometimes. A couple of days ago I slept most of the day, but I've been feeling a bit better everyday. I have this feeling like I may have brought it on myself by stressing myself out and exhausting myself. I'm trying to take it easy and not stress myself out so much. I tend to try to use stress as a motivator, which is silly because it doesn't work very well, it doesn't make me more productive, in fact I tend to be less productive, so now I've been looking at finding new ways to motivate myself. My default setting seems to be, "go back and forth from laid-back lazy mode to anxiety stressed mode and back again." Then there's also creative mode, that only seems to ever hit me by surprise. If I could take that mode and harness it, I wouldn't need to see-saw between the other ones.

My dad has an anxiety panic disorder, so I might as well learn better ways of studying and stuff before I develop that too, or one of the other many hereditary illnesses in our family (bipolar disorder, depression, paranoid psychosis). It's just that there's so many things I'd like to do in one day, but only so much time in one day. Maybe I should focus more on what I do each week rather than each day. I've only got one lecture each week to go to at the moment, as all my other subjects are education subjects, and aren't on while the Education students are on Prac, so I've got more time for me to get over being sick and experimenting with things.


Wednesday, May 07, 2003
 

Avril Lavigne Worship Album


Oh yes, how could I forget? Someone on the bus home from Arts Weekend of Doom mentioned that Avril Lavigne has in the past made a worship album(s). So I guess her original plan was to become a mini-Darlene. That reminds me of another little thingy I've been thinking of doing, writing Ten Songs About Avril Lavigne.I've only got the titles so far:



1. It's not so Complicated

2. She's legal now

3. Anti-Britney [or just another clone?]

4. Confession [I photoshopped you]

5. I know I'm not a Sk8r Boi, but will I do?

6. You're cute when you're angsty

7. Who needs a real girlfriend? Oh yeah, I do

8. If only human cloning were legal

9. Pr0n (this one I imagine to be a techno remix of Confession[I photoshopped you])

10. When I masturbate, I only think of you (I imagine this one to be a slow, romantic, backstreet boys etc boy band type song)


 

Arts Weekend of Doom



Recently I went on the Arts Weekend of Doom and lots of interesting things happened, so I thought I’d write a bit about some of them. Why,I’m only scratching the surface here!

I liked the fact that on the concert nights there were quite a few songs aboutoh-I-like-this-girl-but-she-doesn’t-like-me-so-I’ll-winge-about-it type stuff, (comedy ones, not serious ones) like there was Patrick’s nerdy teenage boy maths book margin poetry, after he did the goth weblog poetry one with Bill. And then there was also Bill and Stan and Co. with that stalker type song. And not only that, there was also that band with those girls and they sung a song that was like, a get-it-through-your-thick-head-that-I-don’t-like-you,-thank-you-I-know-I-have-nice-tits-now-can-you-please-leave-me-alone-and-go-away type song. It was sort of like on the same kind of theme, but that one was from the girls’s perspective. So it kind of all balanced out and stuff. Maybe there’s some kind of karmic principle there or something.


The drama people had some interesting improvisation things, like making up a verse of a song and acting out the randomly picked section of the bible, but each time they only got about half way through the people, then they must have decided they ran out of steam and sat down. Oh well. I was a bit disappointed though that nobody got a genealogy. That would have been interesting, with all that begetting all over the place. There was one that was a hard one to act out, I think that one was one of the introductory bits to one of Paul’s letters, where he’s just giving his greetings to everybody and stuff.


I was in Media, and we did movies and stuff, and that was good. I would have liked though to have known more about what was going on beforehand though, like about that whole come up with three words, make into a phrase, and have a film, omething written about it and drawn about it (or something? I dunno. There was really only time for doing the film though). Seeing as I did have other things I thought I might do on camp. It might have been helpful if our house party leaders actually came to the
Arts Weekend meetings. Or at least emailed us about what was going on. I felt like us other Media facilitators were left out of the loop a bit. We didn’t know what was going on. Oh yeah, and the collaboration with drama was good. They did the acting in our film thingies. I remember Jim Rawson saying that when SMADD first started they were going to do a musical. I think that’s an idea that could be resurrected. We could have one finished thing that all house parties contribute to. The song and music people do all the singing and music, the drama people do acting, dance people dance, art people do sets and costumes, media people write the script. Everything is supposed to have something to do with the same theme anyway, so it would just be more...unified. But some things have to happen before others, like the thing would have to be written before you could really do anything else. I don’t think it would end up happening, not on a long weekend (Arts Weekend) or weeklong camp(SMADD). Maybe we should all take 6 months off and go live in a commune. Although that might be too long, we might not want to even see each other after that long.


I’m not too upset though, because I liked the whole socialising aspect, catching up with some people I haven’t seen in a while, and meeting new people, including some people I had met on the internet, rather than the let’s-do-something-creative-together-part. Like there was that night when we all stayed up ‘till about 12:30
singing that same song in a heap of different styles, Jazz, rap, Britney Spears, goth weblog poetry, you name it. Another experience to be archived in the Arts Weekend/SMADD lore, greatly embellished in times to come.


That night when we had the disco thing, I came up with a new dance move: Push ups. I liked Bill’s like, whatchimacallit, video thingy that goes along with the music. Some of it looked like Salvador Dali type stuff.


I came up with a new character, Nutsack the squirrel (he carries a sack of nuts over his shoulder). Actually I think he was a chipmunk, but ‘Nutsack the squirrel’ sounds better, rolls of the tongue and whatnot. I also want to finish now this sequel to the ‘Meet the L33t’ comic I did.


Something rather bizarre we found in the bookshop was a Christian sex manual. You know, for all those sex orgies that Christians have all the time. Actually it was just for married couples, of course. Because, you know, they’d be there on their wedding night and would be like, ‘gosh, what do we do now? Where does this thing go?’ kinda like these people
(Notice this quote:


I am writing this while on our honeymoon. We would like to say thanks for your service. We even put a thanks in from us to you in our order of service!! Talk about GOD being in the meeting! May God richly bless your service and those
looking for God's helpmate for them. If you are looking, look to God first, he will lead to you in the right direction!


‘...I am writing this while on our honeymoon...’ WTF??!!!111 OMG LOL Roflmao!!11111). It even had some high-school biology textbook diagrams (Woah, man, check out them ovaries!). Although I don’t remember coming across
any Kama Sutra type diagrams. Maybe it only talks about the specific sexual positions that have been approved as being in line with Christian teachings. But which are those? Ooh, controversy! I can see it now, the next big debate on Smurflist: ‘Does anal sex glorify God?’ Okay, let’s not go there.


I just don’t understand why it is specifically a Christian sex manual. I mean, it’s like having a Christian recipe book (actually, there is that now, it’s called What Would Jesus Eat. I’m not joking, it’s in my church’s bookshop. How scary is that! [Almost as scary as the fact that the bookshop also has Jack T. Chick tracts. {Don’t you love brackets within brackets within brackets? I used to do it all the time when writing as a kid but don’t do it so much anymore.}]) or making Christian bricks or having that Christian Guide to tying your shoelaces (I think that was an Adrian Plass joke). Why not just buy regular sex manuals? What’s wrong with an ordinary copy of the Kama Sutra? How, exactly, is Christian sex so radically different from non-Christian sex?


It represents, I suppose, one of the extremes of the hey-let’s-find-a-way-to-infiltrate-
this-subculture type mentality, which, ironically enough, was exactly what we were discussing on camp. Like the difference between someone who wants to appeal to particular people so tries to act like them without even understanding them, so are kind of being deceptive in a way, and those who just happen to have the same things in common so they already occupy the same ‘subculture’, they don’t have to try to ‘Christianise’ it. And also how we don’t need to set up our own Christian subculture within a subculture within a subculture within a subculture within a subculture until we no longer have any contact with anyone else and exist in our own little universe. It reminds me of this scary statistic I heard that most people within two years of becoming a Christian no longer have any non-Christian friends. They just become absorbed into Christian ubculture within Christian subculture within Christian subculture within Christian subculture within Christian subculture. Of course statistics can’t always be trusted of course.

It’s almost as scary as these articles here on Christian porn (look for them in Too Much Coffee Man magazine no. 13.) It seems to be mainly about this guy from a Christian band, who became a porn star. But he maintains that he is a still a Christian because they are Christian porn movies (that’s one of the strangest oxymorons I’ve ever heard). They have all the normal stuff in porn movies (I’m not sure if ‘normal’ is quite the right word) with the exception that they all find Jesus in the end, realise that they are sinning, have an instant conversion and no longer have sex orgies anymore. Now, a word of caution here, this is the Internet we’re talking about here, so there’s the possibility that the whole thing is just made up. I find it rather hard to believe. Even so, even if it is a complete load of crap, it is still an interesting story. That’s the thing that some people just don’t
seem to realise about urban legends and hoaxes and things. It doesn’t particularly matter whether it is true or not. It only matters whether it is a good story. That’s probably also a good definition of postmodernism, but I don’t want to go into that.


I’d like to be able to choose the kind of things that go into the bookshop thing. I’d have CS Lewis, JRR Tolkien, GK Chesterton, Dorothy L Sayers, George Macdonald (the inklings and friends), and also Francis A Schaeffer and James W Sire. Oh, and I’ll add Norman Giesler as well. I liked his Christian critique of pantheism that he did with another guy, and the one he did on Thomas Aquinas. Sometimes on camps there’s CS Lewis, or even Francis A Schaeffer, because CS Lewis is the well known one, and Francis A Schaeffer, and his son, Franky shaeffer, have those books on the relationship between Christianity and the Arts. Now I think that Mind of the Maker by Dorothy L Sayers would also be useful, as she takes the concept of God as creator and his creation, and also the concept of the Author as creator. Other people have done this before and used one to explain the other, what makes this different is that she uses both to explain each other, so by the end of the book it’s like you have a new understanding of both. Some of Tolkien’s essays would also be useful, On faerie stories springs to mind. Some of these authors are hard to find, I think aren’t even printed anymore, Chesterton, Sayers and Macdonald. Oh, and JP Holding. How could I forget him? He has some books he sells on Amazon.com I think.

Now I’ve been noticing the weblog ads changing depending on whatever I’m talking about. I think I remember bill mentioning getting Christian dating services ads on his, which makes sense, tee hee hee. Now I’m wondering what kind of ads I’ll get now with this post. I might also get some of those weirdo visitors as well, like people who want to buy some of that ‘Christian porn.’ There is lots of other things I could talk about, but I’ve already written over 1700 words so that’s enough for now. Maybe I’ll write some more another time. Hmm. I probably won’t. Oh well.


Saturday, March 08, 2003
 

TIMECUBE!!!


Hey, did you know that the Timecube guy had a public
debate? Here's an article from someone who went to see it.

check out this bit...
Gene Ray began to explain his theory, one that he said he has been
trying to get people to understand for nearly 20 years. He says that
his theory will change everyone's understanding of the world and that
universities don't want to hear the truth. He says that authorities
at other campus' have threatened to arrest him because his principle
is so world-changing and threatening. The sad part about it is that
he doesn't seem to understand that the arrest threats never came
because they were "scared" of how the theory would change the world,
but because he quite literally does not have the "cubeless" words to
try and explain what in the hell he is talking about and he comes
across as some senile, crazy guy...and no one wants a senile, crazy
guy cluttering up their campuses. He wasn't invited to debate the
theory at MIT because they were open-minded...these geeks invited him
to make a mockery of him and he didn't seem to understand that
either.


Poor old timecube guy.

Thursday, March 06, 2003
 

Just Imagine If...


Imagine a world without lamers
Wouldn’t it be divine?
No more “Mainstream Alternative” music,
Reality TV,
Or Deconstructionist movements
Within Literary Criticism.

Human resources would become
Staff, and Information Resource
Centres would become
Libraries. Cafe Lattes, Tall Blacks,
Short Whites and Espresso
Would
All become coffee.

Teenyboppers
Would be
Domesticated.

There would be no more talk of:
Moving to the next level
Backsliding,
Unpacking,
Or comfort zones.

Government propaganda
Would be outlawed,
And,
Rather than elections,
Beauty contests would
Decide who rules.

Girls would always date
Their lonely nice guy
Nerd friends,
Thus, eliminating
Much angst-filled
Weblog entries.

Conversly, other nice
Nerd guys
Would date all the
Fat girls with nice
Personalities they
Never noticed before,
As,
They were too busy
Worrying
About their female
Friends who
Wouldn’t date them.

Life would be
Beautiful. So come,
Let’s lock up these
Lamers, and first
Begin with me.

Monday, February 17, 2003
 

Valentine's Day Comic


I did a comic on Valentine's Day, and here it is.

Friday, February 14, 2003
 

OH NO!!!


They've gone again. Honestly, they just don't know whether they're coming or going.

 

Hooray!


Ah, there they are, I told you so.

 

Come back,
commenty thingies!!!


Uh oh, Haloscan must be having problems or something again,
the commenty things have disappeared. This seems to happen
every now and then. They're gone on other weblogs too, I've
noticed. Don't worry, they'll come home soon.

Thursday, February 13, 2003
 

Prosperity Heresy


Jesus stands up on the sermon of the mount, and begins to teach
the crowd of followers. “Alright! Anyone want to be poorer this year?
Put your hand up! No? Well, We’re going to reach a whole new level!
You know why? Because you’re not millionaires yet! My goal is that
we’re gonna need wheelie bins down these aisles to take up offerings!”

“Excuse me, Rabbi, what’s a Wheelie bin?”

“Huh? Oh, something they have in the 20th and 21st Centuries.
Now, where was I? Now, some of you have some funny ideas
about why I came and incarnated myself on earth.
Something about dying for people’s sins. Actually, I came
so that you could all have life more abundantly. And that
doesn’t mean you will have a more meaningful and
purposeful existence, no, actually it means you will
have more material wealth here and now!”

The rich Pharisees: “Hooray!”

[A disciple comes up and whispers in Jesus’ ear]
“What’s that? Did I say something about saving up
riches in heaven? Sorry, you must have misheard me.
God wants you to give so that you can get back more!
What’s that?”[A little boy tugs on Jesus’ sleeve]

“Please, help me. My whole family is starving,
and my mother is sick.”

“Have you paid your tithe?”

“No, we haven’t got any money and…”

“AH! Did you know that God wants to bring many
blessings into your life? If only you could see the
many blessings that God wants to give you in your
future, but He can only give that to you if you sow
your seed. That means giving ABOVE your tithe,
because your tithe already belongs to God. You
have to give, so you can receive back more. Because
God doesn’t move or release his power unless
somebody first moves on earth.”

“How did He create the universe, then?”

“Huh?”

“You said that God doesn’t move unless
somebody first moves on earth. Then how did he
create the universe when there was nobody else around?”

“Listen, my son. You must step out of your comfort
zone. I want you to make it your goal to reach a
whole new level of giving this year.” [Jesus pushes
the little boy aside to his disciples, who give him
a new Christian’s pack.]

“NEXT!!!”

It just doesn’t fit, does it? You just can’t think
of Jesus as your typical charismatic prosperity doctrine
“health and wealth” preacher. Can you imagine Jesus
signing copies of his newly released worship album?
Or giving five essential tips for a more happy successful
life that will instantly solve all your problems on the
Australian Christian Channel? I don’t think so.

Rather than being based on a careful interpretation
of what the scriptures actually say, (exegesis) the
“prosperity” message more often comes from self-help
pop psychology books (I know because I’ve read some
of these self-help books and I’ve noticed similarities to
the sermons!) with a handful of poorly interpreted bible
verses thrown in to support whatever the preacher is
saying. (This is eisegesis, reading into scripture what
you want it to say rather than working out what it meant
to the people it was written to when it was written etc.)

If you want to know what things in the bible meant when
they were written I recommend tectonics.org
[but not tektonics.com , which is completely different!]
or the Christian Think-tank, such as these thingies here:

Tithed in knots
Fallacious Faith
Love
Hope

From Fallacious Faith:

Limitations upon what we may receive are clearly set by the context.
The Lord's Prayer instructs us to pray for daily needs (Matt. 6:11) --
it does not say, "Give us this day a Rolls Royce." Earthly children ask
for bread or fish (7:9-10) which are "basic staples in the Palestinian diet"
that were provided to children on a regular basis. We can ask for "good
things" (7:11), a term which sometimes referred to prosperity generally,
but also "referred to agricultural produce that the righteous would share
with others (Test. Iss. 3:7-8)." Neither the Jewish nor the Roman client-patron
background would understand the mountain-moving phrase as literal permission
to request whatever our selfishness desires -- or to expect something to be
given to us contrary to the will and desire of the patron.


I thought this was kind of funny as I have seen a church
service where the pastor said that he was really believing
and having faith for God to provide him with a fancy new sports car.

From the essay on Tithing:


Has this changed in the New Testament? Obviously this is
our key question for today, but it needs to be answered by
first understanding how the world of the ancients was vastly
different than our own, as reported in Pilch and Malina's
Handbook of Biblical Social Values. It should first be understood
that the ancient world held a concept of limited good, which is
in contrast to our own society's conception of inexhaustible resources.
Of course our resources technically are not inexhaustible -- they
just seem like they are because we don't see the whole line of source
and production! But for the ancients all good -- whether tangible or
intangible -- was in limited supply, and it was obvious that it was.
This was coupled with the paradigm of honor and shame, so that
any person who held to too much of the limited supply was viewed
as greedy and dishonorable if they did not "share the wealth" with
those less fortunate. Hence John the Baptist urges people to share
their surplus (Luke 3:11)


And:


If we are to take this illustration at value, then the principle is
expounded that those who have less than they need do not
need to give anything at all, while those who have more than
they need are to give away what they do not need. Indeed this
fits exactly with the premise of limited good, and the practice
of the early church: "And the multitude of them that believed
were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them
that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but
they had all things common." (Acts 4:32; cf. Luke 12:48) Not a
percentage, but whatever you had that you did not need! Of course
this would lead to a discussion, "What do I need, then?" but that's
a hot potato for one's own conscience and more detail than can be
provided here. However, it is enough to point out that vague threats
like Pink's (Who says to one who has lost much money and says
they cannot afford tithing, that things will get worse if they don't, and
who tells those who make even $1.00 per day that they need to tithe!)
are way out of line.


I like that idea of “limited good”, I think our capitalistic society
needs it as an antidote (hyper-Capitalists always seem surprised
at the idea that by amassing large amounts of wealth that they are
“taking it away” from the poor. After all, we earned it, they say, and
if the poor want some they can get off their lazy bottoms and get it
themselves, it’s only their own fault that they are poor, they say.
Completely unaware that there is only so much “stuff” that go around).

I don’t have anything against tithing or giving money. After all,
Churches, Christian Organisations etc and all their various projects
they have, must get their money from somewhere, don’t they? However,
I think that if your pastor’s sermons are about “giving” 90-100% of the
time (such as in my church, although it’s really one pastor in particular)
then there could be something wrong! Sometimes I get the feeling that
this pastor thinks that all the rest of the stuff in the bible, about loving
your neighbour, seeking after righteousness and knowing God (All that
stuff that goes along the lines of: "hey you! Think about someone else
for a change!") etc is all just a silly distraction from the single purpose
of giving money to the church! (I’d hate to think what a visiting non-Christian
would think!) I should also say that his few 1-10% of messages that are
not centred on giving money are usually good, and it is a pity that he does
not use those ones more often. You really have to admire his skills in
sophistry, it’s just a pity he seems more interested on spreading his own
ideas then those contained in the bible!